Recent Forum Posts
 From categories: All categories Cuil Unit Forum: Introductions Cuil Unit Forum: Cuil Theory Academics Cuil Unit Forum: Cuil Theory Philosophy Cuil Unit Forum: General Discussion Off Topic Forums: OT Forums Off Topic Forums: Website Business
page 1123...next »
. . . . . (guest) 06 Jun 2013 14:47
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Philosophy Of Cuil

yes

by . . . . . (guest), 06 Jun 2013 14:47

So, as the number of Cuils rises, wouldn't the amount with which it can be measured be less finite? Is there an upper bound with which something can be measured in Cuils until it is so abstract that the Cuil itself no longer has any meaning?

(Also, as a side note, is the Cuil linear or exponential?)

As the number of Cuils rises... by , 05 May 2013 22:33
Alex McCormick (guest) 02 May 2013 04:39
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics » Echo Theory & Misc. Ideas

I should like to add that these new "layers" should not be thought of as layers, but entirely new dimensions or variables in the situation. I had, when originally pondering the mathematics of Cuil Theory, considered the thought that each increase in the Cuil level adds another variable to the equation that solves for the quantified reality coefficient. Although, quantifying reality is a difficult thing to do. Perhaps the equation solves for a probability relating the likelihood of the event to the rules of our reality. Anyway, I like way you have the equation set up, but it is troubling because the "n" values would all cancel out. That is why I propose that each increased Cuil level add a variable to the equation such that C(sub)0=x/n(sub)0, C(sub)1=n(sub)1/(x/n(sub)0). This of course explains it using your model, which serves as a good way to initially visualize the concept. However, I feel that the equation would be much more complex and changing. Each variable would be dependent on the previous. As you progressed from one Cuil level to the next, the reality would become continually more complex until another variable entirely was changed, i.e. the linearity of time. If something this monumental were to be changed the entire equation would change. This also assumes that the increases in Cuil level correlate to the same changes in every reality. I don't personally believe that they will. If present reality were represented as a point in a 3-D matrix. Now you move exactly one Cuil level (represented here as a distance, although it should not be confused as one) away. In which direction do you go? It could be any direction, resulting in a line segment connecting two realities. The second reality could be anything in an infinity of possibilities. This is one reason that I associate Cuil Theory with the Multi-verse Theory.

As far as the negative Cuil debate goes, I think that there should be negative Cuils. Again though, this situation must be thought of in three dimensions, with the points being an infinite number of realities. Travelling from one reality to another may require an abstraction from that reality (if it were more than one Cuil away). Travelling back would require the same negative Cuil abstractions, similar to vectors in physics. However, the Cuil abstraction from reality to reality does not travel linearly from point to point in this proposed 3-D matrix. Imagine that the "density," for lack of a better word, of this matrix fluctuated throughout the matrix. This would mean that it would require a different way of travelling to move from point A to B when compared to the movement from B to C.

I doubt that the concept of this is physically imaginable. I am currently struggling with the concept myself, but wanted to offer my interpretation. I will continue to attempt to solve this riddle.

by Alex McCormick (guest), 02 May 2013 04:39

omniresearchsupply.[co]m

Become an authorized reseller of the best anti-aging/anti-wrinkle removal product around.Start your own business with this product or integrate this unique high demand product to your own. We are signing up exclusive authorized resellers in both the USA and internationally. Applying is easy and there is no charge to become a reseller. This product is simply amazing and sells itself anywhere in the world. Watch the 5 minute demo and see this incredible product remove wrinkles immediately.

THERE IS NO CHARGE FOR THE AUTHORIZED RESELLERS.

Our Product is Taking the World by Storm, with signing up authorized resellers all over the country and in many foreign countries.

Click below to see a QUICK DEMO.
omniresearchsupply.[co]m/distributor-information

Jawshhwa Dayvys (guest) 19 Mar 2013 02:37
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions » Welcome to the forum

I love you

by Jawshhwa Dayvys (guest), 19 Mar 2013 02:37
17 Mar 2013 20:58
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions » Welcome to the forum

Is that really just one Cuil, I would say that is a lot more

Re: Welcome to the forum by , 17 Mar 2013 20:58
Sapphire (guest) 08 Mar 2013 20:44
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?

I think Tesco are putting the Cuil theory into practice…

by Sapphire (guest), 08 Mar 2013 20:44
Sapphire (guest) 08 Mar 2013 20:43
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?

*-1‽: You asked me for a hamburger, I gave you a hamburger, it is made from 100% beef, a horse was killed to make it

by Sapphire (guest), 08 Mar 2013 20:43
martymcfly (guest) 19 Feb 2013 21:04
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?

GUYS
If negative cuil is the unified theory of everything in the universe, then negative cuil is the cuil theory itself

by martymcfly (guest), 19 Feb 2013 21:04
heyy (guest) 17 Feb 2013 03:25
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Philosophy Of Cuil

is this fuck for real? cuz that looks real

by heyy (guest), 17 Feb 2013 03:25
28 Jan 2013 11:07
in discussion Off Topic Forums / Website Business » Any requests?

I want to be a mod.

Re: Any requests? by , 28 Jan 2013 11:07

The thing is 0‽ is not the hyper-reality. 0‽ is reality as it is and a standart person cannot reach it, yes.
We define -∞‽ as the perfect hyper-reality.
1‽ is a standart person's perception of reality.

Re: Cuil Theory and Autism by , 28 Jan 2013 07:58

Good work.

Re: A Standard for Cuil by , 28 Jan 2013 07:52
27 Jan 2013 02:48
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics » The Cuil Process

It is my understanding that the cuil theory begins with a completely normal, random, singular idea and then to go up on the cuil scale you need more thoughts and ideas that come off the original idea and then come off of each other.
Think of it like those cloud diagrams you'd make in school. The big main idea is in a bubble in the middle of the paper and then you break that down into multiple sub-ideas in their own bubbles stemming from the original bubble and then from those sub-ideas you break them down into more sub-ideas and so on.
The main, original thought has a cuil value of zero because it is just one idea, but then the first level of sub ideas have a cuil value of 2 and so on. The more levels and the more complex ideas you have the higher the cuil value gets. Because after a while you'll have so many levels and sub-ideas and sects that they will have no relation whatsoever to the original idea except the sub-thoughts in between.
So, in theory you could start out with a hamburger as your main thought and then eventually, using the cuil process you would have a small dog making a chew toy out of the fountainhead of all knowledge and if you put the word "hamburger" next to the words "knowledge fountainhead" it would make no sense, but using cuil we can relate how one thought leads to another.

The Cuil Process by , 27 Jan 2013 02:48
CBenni (guest) 01 Jan 2013 13:37
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics » Just another formal definition of Cuils

Hi,
I stumbled of the Cuil Theory and was mildly interested in it. However, as a undergraduate maths student, one thing is bugging me: The "levels of abstractness" is not well defined. Instead I have thought about a alternative definition:

Firstly, I will tell you something about cuntinuverse theory: This is an expansion of the Multiverse theory proposed by quantum physicists in the early 1900s. It does not assume a countable (or even finite) number of universes, but instead a Infinite-dimensional universe, in which every universe, EVERYTHING exists. The Idea of it is: 3D space is where we live. Adding a 4th dimension, we have a sequence of 3D spaces, and we could call the 4th coordinate "Time". The 5th dimension combines multiple timelines, in 1 universe, with the same starting point, with the same laws of nature. Next, the 6th dimension modifies the starting point (Usually the "big bang"). In this dimension, you find 5 dimensional universes that started of with a different, or no big bang at all. This can be continued on and on and on, but I dont want to bother you. But be told that a 8 dimensional universe allows you to find a universe in which you are actually a radio wave that has a terrible, terrible headache while buzzing around a hamburger that is made out of milk.

Here we get really close to Cuil theory and we can define (integer) Cuils:
A event A is a subset of the infinite dimensional universe U.
We define the embedding space of A $\text{em}(A)$ as the lowest-dimensional submanifold S of U that contains A and the dimension $\dim(A)$ of A as the dimension of S. (For things we can imagine, this is just the same dimension as we would call it. A (infinitely thin) piece of paper would have dimension 2, Your dog has dimension 3 and your dog wagging its tail dimension 4)

For 2 events A,B we can now define the Cuility of B towards A (measured in Cuils) as

(1)
\begin{align} Cuil(A,B):=\dim(A\cup B)-\dim(A)\\=\dim(B)-\dim(A\cap B) \end{align}

On top of that, if it is clear which A we use, we can write $Cuil(B):=Cuil(A,B)$. In most cases, A will be our 4-dimensional spacetime (where I ask you for a hamburger).

This almost holds with the layers of abstraction in general Cuil theory. If I ask you for a hamburger, that is a 4 dimensional event. If you hand me a hamburger and I turn into a dog wagging its tail while balancing on a 1-dimensional radio wave with a headache, that would be Cuil 4: $\dim A =4$, $\dim B =8$, $\dim (A\cup B)-\dim A=8-4=4$.

Secondly, lets look at alternative definitions for the dimension for an event: For example, using hausdorff dimension (or similar), a Menger sponge has dimension $\frac{\log 20}{\log 3}\approx 2.7268$. If you hand me a Hamburger in the shape of a Menger sponge, that would be either dimension 4 or 7 (depending on if its actually possible to build a true menger sponge in this universe), however, a radio wave inside a Menger sponge would have dimension 5.7268 or 8.7268, and, of course, terrible, terrible migrane.

EDIT: Continuation.

We can define Operators $+$, $-$, $\cdot$ and $/$ by

$Cuil(A,B)+Cuil(A,C):=Cuil(A,B\cup C)$

$Cuil(A,B)-Cuil(A,C):=Cuil(A,B\backslash C)$

$Cuil(A,B)\cdot Cuil(A,C):=Cuil(A,B\times C)$

$Cuil(A,B)/Cuil(A,C):=Cuil(A,B/ C)$

This highly depends on the actual events.

Examples:
A = You ask me for a hamburger. (dim=4)
B = I give you a hamburger. The hamburgers eye twitches involuntarily (dim=6, 2‽)
C = A hamburger goes for a stroll in time. I give you a racoon. (3‽)
B+C = I give you a hamburger. The hamburgers eye twitches involuntarily and a hamburger goes for a stroll in time. Then, I give you a racoon (dim=7, 3‽)
B-C = I give you nothing. (dim=4, 0‽)
B*C = I give you a hamburger. Because the hamburger is going on a stroll in time, we revolve around history. The racoon gives me the hamburger. Time twitches. I give you a stroll in time while my racoontwitches involuntarily. We see every possible happening and every timeline get eaten by you. The racoons eye twitches. I give you a hamburger. Nothingness commences as the hamburger reaches its destination. I eat time, my watch is gone. We take a stroll in a hamburger. The racoon runs to the twitching eye. It shakes. I give you a hamburger. We come to a halt. I give you a hamburger. We twitch in all directions, at the same time and after one another. I give you a twitching hamburger. The twitching hamburger gives me a racoon. I give you a hamburger. The hamburgers eye twitches on a stroll in time. I give you a hamburger. The hamburger strolls along a path in time that follows the contours of the racoon. (… (infinite other events follow here) …) (dim=6*3=18, 18-4‽=14‽) In fact, every possible event that can be created by the two starting ones, happens
B/C = The hamburger is a racoon. The hamburgers/racoons eye twitches involuntarily. (dim=5, 1‽)

A = Inside or a menger sponge, I feel pain in my head, because I am a radio wave (4.7268‽)
B = The hamburger sits on a bench, sleeping. (1‽)
C = I carefully open a book. I look at the stars. They are grains of sesame on the hamburger. The universe is contained in the sponge.(5.7268‽)
Excercise: Calculate these results: B+C, B*C, B-C, B/C. Good luck with not getting your brain exploded.

cu, CBenni

Just another formal definition of Cuils by CBenni (guest), 01 Jan 2013 13:37
Gordon (guest) 31 Dec 2012 19:33
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy » Cuil Theory and Autism

I propose the process described above to be known as the Tyler transcendence.

by Gordon (guest), 31 Dec 2012 19:33
27 Dec 2012 01:26
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions » Hello fellow schollars.

I to, wish to become one with the Cuil. America.

Hello fellow schollars. by , 27 Dec 2012 01:26
Sage (guest) 15 Dec 2012 04:26
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy » Cuil Theory and Autism

I give you an Asperger

by Sage (guest), 15 Dec 2012 04:26
The Anon Who (guest) 12 Dec 2012 23:03
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics » What if the Cuil....

What if this theory is more trying to pry into the mind of a human being, and pull out the utmost of emotions? And where as you get deeper and deeper into the mind, it increases in cuils.
The absurdity of it all could be more of a break from our own ideas. Maybe rather than trying to put it out all mathematically, the theory is intended to break us out of the walls which we bind ourselves? Maybe we are looking at this wrong.
Maybe the cuil represents more than numbers. Maybe it can't even be measured in numbers.

What i'm trying to say is that maybe the Cuil is, rather than a mathematically solvable problem, a way to allow us to put our mind into sentences.
Maybe the cuil is finding out how we think, and that the way we think is by hopping from one idea to another, that every idea we have is important, yet odd.
If you think about it, most people censor their own thoughts before they allow themselves to form words or sentences. Perhaps this could even be called idiocy, but in a captured form which we are able to really measure.
So what if the 0 cuil is what we think and monitor on a dayly basis.
And as you enter negative cuils it becomes what we think that becomes monitored up to the point where we become mute.
So possibly, the cuil theory is a way of trying to open the mind so that we can enter the far wings of our thoughts and try to understand them.

This is just my personal thought, and of course I am very open to hearing what other's think about this.

What if the Cuil.... by The Anon Who (guest), 12 Dec 2012 23:03
The Anon Who (guest) 12 Dec 2012 22:52
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions » Welcome to the forum

hello, i suppose to introduce myself i'll start off with my own little try at this whole thing?