Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »
the 8th Cuil
derfnar (guest) 03 Jan 2017 13:41
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion » the 8th Cuil

8th Cuil: You ask for a hamburger. Reality implodes. The rest of what happens is not known. Our tiny human brains can not comprehend what is transpiring. Reality reinstates you wake up in your bed. You look left. You look right. you are married to a hamburger. His name is Randy. She loves you. You are a turtle. The 3rd dimension no longer exists.

the 8th Cuil by derfnar (guest), 03 Jan 2017 13:41
asdf (guest) 18 Dec 2016 16:28
in discussion Off Topic Forums / OT Forums » asd

by asdf (guest), 18 Dec 2016 16:28
asd
asdf (guest) 18 Dec 2016 16:16
in discussion Off Topic Forums / OT Forums » asd

asd by asdf (guest), 18 Dec 2016 16:16
cuil is my life (guest) 24 Oct 2016 16:55
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?

no, this is science. what are you trying to do with your child-like comments? Lower the intelligence of this whole server?!

by cuil is my life (guest), 24 Oct 2016 16:55
cuil is my life (guest) 24 Oct 2016 16:53
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?

this girl knows her cuil.

by cuil is my life (guest), 24 Oct 2016 16:53
cuil guy theorist (guest) 24 Oct 2016 16:52
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?

I feel that 0 cuils would be if u give someone a hamburger and they recievie the hamurger and we live in a plain of 0 cuils. And the hamburger being so perfect you think its your imagination would be like -1 cuils.

by cuil guy theorist (guest), 24 Oct 2016 16:52
cuil guy theorist (guest) 24 Oct 2016 16:48
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?

its not funny its science. if ur not serious about cuil theory get outta here >:(

by cuil guy theorist (guest), 24 Oct 2016 16:48
DesperateSeeker (guest) 05 Sep 2016 10:39
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy » Cuil Generator

Bluetooth was never invented.
Electronics are only known to beings that do not exist.
You exist only while Bluetooth is being invented.
You can only invent Bluetooth technology by turning off the Bluetooth function on your phone.
Because your phone believes that it has
Bluetooth, it never can.
The advent of Bluetooth prevents it from ever existing.
You are scheduled to exist as soon as Bluetooth is invented.

by DesperateSeeker (guest), 05 Sep 2016 10:39

It goes much deeper than just a scaled-mesh through space time. Every mass, every energy that creates a distortion is changing the distances between the quantifiable measurements of the mesh. This can be confusing when looking at regions of local space time within galactic bodies, or near large stellar masses. In which direction does the mesh tighten or expand? We can even cause local distortions around us which can drastically alter our perception of the rest of our reality.

by Kage (guest), 19 Aug 2016 17:16

1 Cuil equals one layer of abstraction (difference) from the original premise or reality, so 2 Cuils are 2 levels away from reality.
EXAMPLE:

1 Cuil; The hamburger that you gave me sprouts legs.
2 Cuils; The hamburger that you gave me sprouts legs and carries the Olympic torch all the way from Olympia, Greece to the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio.

Re: In Laymen's terms by Mr PartisanMr Partisan, 08 Jul 2016 02:01

As you can see, being a "Groundhog Day"-like setting where the same day repeats over and over, Doompy Poomp is a hyper-reality at <0‽.

But as the video progresses, more and more abstractions from reality occur, making the video become <0‽ + >0‽, meaning it is less than zero Cuils plus positive Cuils. Can somebody count all the abstractions from the base reality in the vid?

At present, Buy Gucci Belt many industries, including steel, cement and so on, the excess capacity is blind pursuit of investment as a result, the excess capacity more than ten for years, and became one of the structural problems that affect Buy Gucci Belt economy continues to grow in the future. In terms of industrial structure, due to the imbalance of income distribution and consumption rate is too low, the savings rate is too high, to some extent inhibit the development of service industry in our country. In 2002 was 41.5%, the proportion of Buy Gucci Belt service industry to September 2012, 10 years, the proportion of service industry is increased to 43.8%, among the lowest in the world's major economies. Imbalance of the proportion of the consumption and investment, and definitely not a cyclical problem, but a structural problem, is the problem that affect Buy Gucci Belt economic sustainable development.

Since the central economic work conference in December 2004, the Fake Gucci Belt economy must be from relying on investment and export to relying on domestic demand big decisions, get rid of the over-reliance on the high investment and exports, increase the proportion of consumption in total output, whether the policy level, or community, will be as an important content of Buy Gucci Belt transition economy. Along with the economic development of middle income level, often become an important engine for growth in domestic demand, especially for countries like Gucci Belt Cheap. Particularly interesting is that today argued that continue to rely on investment-led economic Lin, zhang jun, in their point of view and in the paper, also think that Buy Gucci Belt total investment more than the optimal equilibrium value of an economy, fake gucci belt @ mancodebook.com also criticized the Fake Gucci Belt economy excessive investment.

Imbalance of @ http://mancodebook.com/ by Taylor Rogers (guest), 23 Apr 2016 01:55

I think therefore I exist. If you try to measure yourself, you'll be your own reference point and that's a distance of zero cuils.

Hello there!
yampiyampi 28 Jan 2016 21:46
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions » Hello there!

I am Yampi, I got really interested in this cuil theory and I am thinking of making contributions to the philosophy.

Hello there! by yampiyampi, 28 Jan 2016 21:46
Nathaniel (guest) 27 Dec 2015 10:31
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?

I think it depends what the observer considers the most genuine? <0‽, I would imagine, begins taking multiple interpretations of what was asked and the medium through which the request/question was presented; eg., language: Language can be interpreted as everything from mere, small mouth-noises to knives in your soul, with the right application of perceptive versatility. As a result, the person who thinks a hamburger is made of ham, the one who thinks it's beef, and the one who thinks the whole hamburger is a raccoon are all satisfied once we hit any sort of absolute cuil or indefinite reality of the situation. It seems like this unit of measurement (cuil) makes the unified theory of all connect in the sense of helping the sides of it's spectrum to connect in a circle, or maybe a Möbius strip?

by Nathaniel (guest), 27 Dec 2015 10:31
Nathaniel (guest) 27 Dec 2015 10:10
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?

I think 0 cuil's away from the reality of our example is "You ask me for a Hamburger."

That was the example, and the reality of the situation. If I decided to give you a hamburger as well, I think that would take us above 0 cuils' difference from you just asking for one; just not necessarily a whole cuil's difference, relative to this example, which seems catered to our known reality in human culture. Most folks probably aren't too surprised if they perceived to have received a hamburger after asking for one, since most of us don't usually ask people for a hamburger unless we think we can potentially get one by doing so.

Or maybe it's the opposite. Maybe, relative to all of reality (not just our culture), as encompassed in the infinite possibilities of the 'me' variable you're asking a hamburger of; it could be even more abstract than a raccoon, to receive a hamburger, since we usually ask someone we we trust will be more hospitable to our hamburger needs, rather than asking a variable of infinite, possible forms and responses, including a lack thereof; also, including the receiving of a hamburger, on your part. Though, from my seemingly limited perception (the person writing this), it seems unlikely to receive a hamburger in such a variable context.

Absolute cuil is something different than 0 cuil maybe? idk, really. The idea is interesting. It just depends how we want to set up our units of measurement and stuff; but again, idk. Time to get some sleep :)

by Nathaniel (guest), 27 Dec 2015 10:10
Blake Wysocki (guest) 17 Dec 2015 01:18
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion » Psychiatric conditions and their relation to Cuil

I guess this sometimes applies to anxiety issues I have. I would have a hard time describing my abstract thought process during an anxiety attack, but I guess if people are still interested in this forum I could try to describe it for you in terms of Cuil.

by Blake Wysocki (guest), 17 Dec 2015 01:18

I think of zero cuil as Truth. For example, I ask for a hamburger. I experience me asking for a hamburger, as do you since I've asked you for a hamburger. Zero cuil represents the external, non-observer's experience of asking for a hamburger. I cannot experience this True experience, since I am me and I experience through observation, however I can define this True experience as the real or true experience. The experience that everyone sees a distortion of when someone asks for a hamburger.

Zero cuil is like a bunch of clues without a detective. The information is there, and any number of possible logical or illogical conclusions/experiences are possible, but no one is drawing conclusions/experiencing.

It is the absence of experience and every experience at once, where every experience is one experience and every experience has been experienced but has never been experienced. Like a light particle that is simultaneously observed and unobserved, and thus simultaneously a wave and a particle and thus cannot exist and yet hyper-exists.

I think zero cuil exists simultaneously with +infinite cuil and -infinite cuil at all times in all situations, since pure chaos and pure order are both singularities of nothingness and zero cuil is the singularity of what Is.

Re: Zero Cuil by Undead RequiemUndead Requiem, 08 Dec 2015 10:50

I agree that cuil is exponential in terms of absurdity, however the number of possible variations is always infinite except at + infinite, - infinite and 0 cuil, where there is one or no possibilities. The expansion I have given gives 1/2 +/- infinite cuil as the infinitely absurd experiential measures. Experiences measured above 1/2 infinite cuil are no longer an attempt to experience the Truth and are experiences of Definition instead. With imaginary bridging, experiences of Definition can be applied to experiences of Truth.

Indeed, your Cuilian Squint Theory may hold a means of perceiving answers. I add to it my own understanding.

In my understanding of your theory, the funnels around Zero Cuil (>.<) expand outward at a possibly exponential rate to the point at which we cease to be able to imagine a possibility as a permutation of 'reality' (represented by zero cuil.) I propose that they then funnel back in to both the positive infinity point and the reddye number, where experience becomes either so logical (reddye) or so illogical (+infinite cuil) that it is completely unimaginable. Thus the squinting diagram would appear such (+)-< >.< >+(-), with both -infinite and +infinite cuil occuring at the same singularity on this cyclical line.

I rationalize this thusly;

When an experience is experienced completely logically (reddye), it ceases to be truthful to 'reality' (0 cuil) and becomes completely theoretical. The example of the circle above works here; when a circle is expressed as 'real-ly' as possible, you have mathematical formula 2 pi r2. If we take this as the definition for 'circle', anything that can be defined as a singular, numerical value can be applied to this equation, since 'r' no longer means 'radius' but rather is a part of the definition of 'circle'. At this point 'circle' becomes completely meaningless despite being a singular definition for all things, since one can enter the value for circle into the calculation for the value of circle. Thus 'circle' refers to nothing and everything within the True, and is perfectly defined as 2 pi r2.

On the positive end of the spectrum, an experience is experienced completely illogically. This experience is also false to 'reality' (0 cuil) and completely theoretical. To completely understand how our circle fits into positive infinite cuil, I wish to take you down the spectrum. Immediately, the circle is a 'circle' instead of a formula. At one cuil, where most of us live, the circle is a hamburger bun, or a patty, or perhaps a knot on a tree trunk. There is an infinite number of things that fit this definition of 'circle,' but there are also an infinite number of things that do not. Just as there is an infinity between 0 and 1, but 0<x<1 does not describe all numbers. All of these things are circles by the 1 cuil definition, but none of them are 'a circle.' As we branch along the spectrum the number of things that are defined as a 'circle' increase exponentially, until we can no longer count them. At the outer extremes of the positive spectrum, our experience of 'circle' has expanded so far that all things are contained within the definition. We have a situation of total entropy where all things are the same and we have a singular definition of everything that is a circle.

Does this singular definition sound familiar? Both reddye and positive infinite cuil end with a definition of 'circle' that is so untrue to the 'real' that they are nearly completely hypothetical, and only applicable to our attempts to comprehend the truth of 'circle' at zero cuil. By this logic, the band of possible experiences would be completely cyclical although not closed, such that there is an infinite number of possibilities between zero cuil and +/-infinite cuil. Seems fitting, since there is an infinite number of possibilities between 0 and +/- infinity.

Expanding upon this theoretical circle of cuil, where we picture a funnel system between 0 cuil and +-infinite cuil along the + and - axis, imaginary cuil fits in the space between the + and -. Where + and - values of cuil are found as locations within the dimensional plane of the axes, imaginary cuil is found in non-dimensional experience. This is the connection between the incomprehensive 0 cuil and unTrue infinite cuil. If we see 0 cuil as the Truth, and infinite cuil as the abstract understanding of the Truth, then imaginary cuil is the application of the abstract understanding within the singularity of Truth. It is the bridge between every opposing possibility in this cyclical linear explanation of experiential possibility. Imaginary cuil is the measuring unit for distances between non-linear cuils. At 0i cuil, the circle is completely True (0 cuil), completely unTrue (-+infinite cuil) and both perfectly defined and undefined, thus the circle is both at the 0 cuil and +/-infinite cuil levels of experience. There is 0 distance between 0 cuil and +-infinite cuil. At +-infinitei cuil, the experience is neither True nor defined. There is infinite distance between experiences.

At 2i cuil, our 'circle' is defined as both 2 pi r2 and the abstract "circle" of all things, as defined above in my explanation of -infinite and +infinite cuil. However, these definitions are no longer completely hypothetical. The definition does not completely describe the thing named 'circle' as it is at 0 cuil. There is

I hypothesize that we have an innate understanding of how to bridge the distance measured by imaginary cuil, and that is why we can use 2 pi r2 to describe a circle and everyone knows roughly what we mean. I believe that a part of understanding the imaginary cuil is in the application of every definition together at once, the definition of 'radius' and 'shape' and 'distance' all factoring in to what the definition of 'circle' means so that 'circle' fits in the True, where 'radius' and 'shape' and distance' exist. The imaginary is the logicalization of the abstract and the abstraction of the logical. It is the connection between 'rose' and 'flower,' and perhaps 'red' and even 'love.'

I see this theory as compatible with GMT, and this is how. Visualize the mesh of GMT as a 3 dimensional (or more) mesh. Every experience exists within this mesh, and the center of it is -/+infinite cuil and zero cuil. Within this mesh is contained a coloured area, sort of shaped like a multi-dimensional infinity symbol. It is singular at the point where it crosses itself, and each limb expands out from that singularity in thickness. As you travel toward the outer end of each loop the colour fades gradually until you can hardly tell it is there at all. the point where it fades completely is infinite cuil/2. The colour is the essence of our comprehension, and the width of the band is the infinite possible experiences of 'True' and 'Definition' at that number of cuil. However, there is more mesh than that which is contained within the positive, negative and zero cuil. This is the imaginary cuil, which we can pretend to experience. Positive imaginary cuil surrounds the positive cuil loop, -i cuil surrounds the - cuil loop. Through our attempts to experience through the imaginary cuil, that which is neither quite defined nor True, we can change our own experience and our perception of Truth and definition, so that perhaps, for a while, we are able to experience at 7 or 8 cuil, or -5, or -12. The less true and defined we are willing to get (the closer to +/- infinite i cuil), the farther we are able to jump in experience. If we equal +/- infinite i cuil, we can shift from +infinite cuil/2 to -infinite cuil/2, theoretically the farthest distance possible within the Cuil Mesh.

… In terms of the colour wheel example for GMT, imagine that + cuil is on the top of the page the wheel is printed on and - cuil is on the bottom, + imaginary cuil is the length of the pencil above the page and - imaginary cuil is the length below the page. This would make the outer edge of the page +/- infinite cuil and the inner edge (touching the pencil) zero cuil. The distance between the outer edge of the paper and the inner edge would have an imaginary cuil measurement of 0i. (This is much the same as how a horizontal line along the x axis of a cartesian plane has y=0, regardless of x.) +/-infinite i cuil is the ends of the pencil where you're holding it. You are +/-infinite i cuil. You connect understanding in the strangest ways possible, and you can comprehend every distance between experiences. To measure (and possibly traverse) a distance between experiences on opposite sides of the page, one must use imaginary cuil or zero/+/-infinite cuil, and since we can't comprehend zero/+/-infinite cuil, we must be imaginary.

Non-imaginary cuil is not a distance from True. From zero cuil. It is a distance between zero cuil and infinite cuil, with such numbers as +infinite cuil -4 cuil being to definition experience what +4 cuil is to Truth experience. The numbers go both ways. Every step away from zero is toward infinity, and vice versa. The midpoint is +/-infinite cuil/2

I must stop and return another day. It grows late, and my mind strays further into abstraction than I intend. It interests me that always we seek to define instead of understand, that we seek logical explanation instead of experience itself. Perhaps it is because so many of us live at one cuil, and, in reaching for the negative side of the spectrum, we hope to comprehend the Truth that lies between. To truly understand the nature of what the cuil measures, I believe that we must understand the immense scope of possibility and perception in every experience. We speak in infinities and zeros and imaginaries as though they mean something beyond the meaning we give them. The cuil is a measure of our experience relative to each other and the eternal truth that ties every experience together. To exist, we must exist within cuil's scale. And yet we seem to have the power to jump through the imaginary from logical experience to illogical and back, without ever experiencing the Truth of zero cuil or the definition of infinite cuil.

page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License