Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page »

An Anti-Cuil is an idea i've been thinking about, what if, instead of getting farther from the reality of a situation, you instead got closer to it?
I standby the idea that this would mean more detail is added to the situation, and you get to see more of the whole picture, with enough levels of Anti-Cuil leading up to describing the creation of the whole universe, all the way to the creation of the first hamburger, leading to the eventual popularity of hamburgers in the United States, to how the hamburger made it's way to you, once it had been asked for.
Maybe this would be the wrong way for Anti-Cuils to manifest though?

Anti-Cuils by Djb0iDjb0i, 11 Jul 2018 12:10

I am for this reinterpretation, as it standardizes Cuil measurements.

I think your -x‽ problem is not actually a problem, as long as you state that this calculates |x‽|. If you think about it, the Reddye Number -∞‽ is supposed to be the most consistent, most real thing. However, in practice this requires nothing short of genius to achieve, so to a person inhabiting 0‽, it will seem as removed from reality as ∞‽, which I think should be called the Babel Number (named after the Library of Babel). This is true if we treat the Grand Mesh like a Riemann sphere, where -∞‽=∞‽. This is also analogous to the fine distinction between genius and madness, where something hyperreal requires a step of 1 Cuil in the negative direction.

We know that the Observer is necessary to measure a Cuil, appearing as "you" in a given Cuil. I'm opening the question: who is "I" in a given Cuil? We know the standard account of "you ask me for a Hamburger." The "you" is the Observer, but who is the "me"? Is it the Narrator? The Reader? Is the Reader narrating? Is "I" just another character, like the small dog? Is "I" just a figment of the imagination, meaning, "you ask me for a hamburger" is really at 1‽? Is the real protagonist "you"?

Personally, after reviewing several Cuil I have come to the conclusion that "I" is the Narrator and the Creator of the system.

What are your thoughts?

Who is the "I" in a given Cuil? by j1ng3rj1ng3r, 30 May 2018 18:04

This theory attempts to solve the issue of inconsistency of quantification of the Cuil value of a given instance.

The real difficulty in trying to define how Cuils increase, whether linearly, exponentially, or logarithmically is because one must analyze not only how Cuils affect reality but also what they are affecting/changing. It is believed that there is a difference between 𝛥‽ and 𝛥 of the Cuilian Effect (changes made by x‽ that removes a given situation from reality) on reality. At the end of this theory, the postulation will be that Cuils are linear in their numerical growth, but exponential in their Cuilian Effect.

It has already been clearly defined that Cuils change aspects of reality, as we perceive it to be, hopefully that perception is relatively close to the actual state of reality, i.e. 0‽.
It has also been agreed upon that the higher x‽ the further removed from reality the observed circumstance is. However, most examples given have simply added more and more details, that subsequently have been altered in order to reach higher degrees of Cuilian derivation from 0‽. Which is all well and good if you don't mind counting an astronomical Cuil numbers in order to quantify 𝛥‽. Thus, if 𝛥‽ is linear, x‽ is a direct result of the number of objects in a scenario, i.e. how "big" is the picture; does it include just you, me, and a hamburger? Or does it also involve music, you, me, creation, a song, a hamburger, and the universe (reddyenumber4's last example on Reddit). This results in the necessity for ∞‽ possibilities, since there is no known, perceivable end to the universe. But this is not rational for a useable system used in the measuring of deviation from reality. Especially because in this 1-detail-change = 1‽ system, any new changed detail increases the number, there seems to be no way to avoid ∞‽, which instead becomes necessary. Because the subject could be handed a picture of themselves being handed a picture of themselves in room full of pictures of them being handed pictures, in all of which there is an entire reality, or at least a picture of a reality, that allows for an infinite number of infinite diversions. Which would mean Cuils are completely useless because they can't be used as a system that increases too rapidly to be measured.

Thus, this theory proposes that we must first define our reality (which must be subjective) in order to even begin to understand how it is being altered and to what extent. In order to do this we have to analyze our existence, not even necessarily as humanity as a species, but as constituents that are cognitive of the whole, and decide where the lowest levels of reality exist. Or at least, our idea of the lowest level. This theory then proposes that 1‽ affects the most superficial strata of reality, 2‽ the second, etcetera. This may seem oversimplified, however, if we consider the levels of reality to progress from the Epistemological (notated as E) level (at 0‽ this is the strata wherein Platonism and logic take affect, is subjective to the frame-of-reference of the viewer, and has the least affect on reality [because it is merely our perceptions/reactions to stimuli]), to the Non-epistemological (notated as NE) level (which is defined as a level consisting of concepts that are purely Euclidean or Newtonian, i.e., they rely solely on the rules of geometry and physics and require no observer to interpret them. E.g. the behavior of atoms and the bonds they form. ncepts such as, "materials' properties change based on the way atoms bond." This is a concept that is foundational for everything that is made of matter, living or nonliving. Thus, it is quintessential for the operation of everything that follows, or that is more complex than a single atom), wherein changes will be incredibly far-reaching and define everything thereafter. Finally, the Causal (notated as C) level (the changes in this strata are nigh incomprehensible as the results will be paracausal. That is, they will have no regard for time or causality, which are arguably the two most archetypal laws of our universe). For example, a Cuilian change in the NE strata could change life to mean plasmoidal, omniscient entities. Why? Because physics or geometry has changed, which could change the necessary qualifications for sentience, which could change the process of thinking or knowing [which is pretty far-reaching]. Meaning that the deeper you go, down towards the base that our reality is built upon, the more all-encompassing the Cuilian Effect. I.e., if you have a Cuilian change in the NE level it is possible to change something at the quantum level, which is an all-encompassing, causal alteration, however, changes in the C level means results that are not bound by any limitations, as opposed to any reality-altering changes in the other levels that are still bound by their own rules. Paracausal changes are not bound by rules, even their own.

It would make sense then that the strata level change wherein the change(s) occurs is x‽. In order to account for changes in different strata without running into 𝛥x‽=∞‽ this theory argues that the number of the two strata be added together. Therefore, E changes take place at 1‽, NE changes occur at 2‽, C at 3‽. Thus changes in the first two levels would be a 3‽ scenario (NE + E = 3‽). It is then postulated that the highest Cuilian value that may be applied to a situation is 6‽ (unless more strata are discovered).

Examples with the above Cuilian Laws:
0‽: I ask for a hamburger and you give me a hamburger
1‽: I ask for a hamburger and you give me a raccoon (the platonic[E change] idea of what a hamburger is has changed)
1‽: I ask for a hamburger and you give me a picture of a hamburger (E change)
2‽: I ask for a hamburger and a raccoon gives me a hamburger (something has changed in the genetics of raccoons[NE change] that allows them to develop to the point of being intelligent, sentient beings.)
3‽: A raccoon asks for a hamburger and I give him a picture of a chair (genetic change in raccoon [NE change], idealistic change of what a hamburger is [E change])
6‽: I manifest an infinite number of planets and an omniscient star-being called a raccoon asks for a kjnasdvoib (C-change allows for paracausal result of infinite number of objects and for the manifesting taking place before the request [lack of time], NE change allows me the ability to manifest objects at will, as well as the existence/ability of a being to be omniscient (the raccoon), E-change causes the idea/word "raccoon" to be an omniscient star as well as allowing for a "kjnasdvoib" to be the name of an object)

This system then allows us to quantify x‽ as well as 𝛥‽ regardless of how absurd the situation without having to count to any number up to ∞. This still allows for an almost infinite number of variations (Cuilian Effects) of the situation and subsequently a near infinite number of digressions from reality (including recursions) even in an 1‽ situation. For example, if there is a scenario where a change at the NE level causes all physics to be different, that could change everything about the scenario. I could be a dog asking a tree for a chair and be given a rock. But it would have the same meaning to the participants of the scenario because there would still be a Theory of Forms in this reality, a form of Platonics. Hence, my asking another being for something that I need or want. This is definitely a crazy scenario, but it's only a 2‽. Why? Because there is still time, philosophical constructs such as desiring, asking, and giving. So, as strange and dreamlike as it is, it's not too far removed from the concepts of our reality.

If this is true, and the levels of reality are stratified, then x‽ can increase linearly, with an exponential Cuilian Effect. This not only makes quantifying x‽ possible, but it also allows for, and solves the issue of quantifying any situation regardless of the frame-of-reference of the viewer.

Obviously this system does not allow for -x‽ in a quantifiable sense, because it seems that since the base definition for a Cuil is the degree that an instance is removed from reality, only impossible situations can be measured by Cuils. Intellectually, -‽ would arguably exist but there seems to be no way to measure something that is possible of occurring using a notation used to measure the impossibility of a situation. If true reality is 0‽, which I would agree is impossible to achieve unless everyone has the same exact perception (a change that could be caused by an E-change in a 1‽ situation, thereby creating the 1‽ = 0‽ paradox), then it is impossible for anything to be hyperreal. Nothing can be "more real than reality" if true reality is unachievable.

By these rules though, a -x‽ situation is possible in a 1‽ situation wherein the definition of "real" has been changed such that the definition of "hyperreal" is not only different from what it is in a near 0‽ reality but also possible. This is where we run into a recursive loop (for more info on recursive loops read Douglas Hofstadter's "Gödel, Escher, Bach," now we are in a 1‽+-1‽ = 0‽ (also, since this system allows for linear increments in x‽ we are able to add the Cuil values, just like when we determine x‽ of any situation). Which brings us back to the 0‽ Paradox because by definition we must be in an, at least, 1‽ scenario for 0‽ to exist.

In this system the Cuilien Effect of the deviation from reality does not have a linear relationship to the Cuilien Value of the situation. The rate of exponential growth of the Cuilien Effect of a deviation is relative to how many aspects of reality have been altered due to the original deviation.

I hope reddyenumber4 reads this and I hope you all will give your feedback. I would love to continue this discussion, especially if there are real (or perceived) flaws in my The Theory of Linear, Stratified Cuil Value.

MrMcPants (guest) 27 Feb 2018 17:29
in discussion Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion » the 8th Cuil


by MrMcPants (guest), 27 Feb 2018 17:29

and I asked your brother to give you a remittance. So, and my brother had more than 10,000 debt, and a dozen years, how are not clear, gave up all the property, but also 20,000, follow-up to give money. But they think that getting me to college is my greatest favor. I knew that the return was so low, let me off to serve my dad.

your brother to give you a remittance by site (guest), 03 Feb 2018 14:29

property seemed to be confiscated. Ten years later, he passed away and my mom said that my dad has no legacy. When I was in college, my mom did not want to use the savings for me. When I was senior, I said that I had no money

property seemed to be confiscated by gues (guest), 03 Feb 2018 14:28

I have always been reluctant to discuss with them the harm to me. How much my dad deposits I do not know, he worked to 50s, before the illness also intends to buy land self-built buildings. After he became ill

I have always been reluctant by new (guest), 03 Feb 2018 14:28

My mom told me that in an ordinary family, let you drop out of school. It was my darkest time, my father could not protect me, I did not know what would happen in the future. Six months later, they bought a house in the city.

My mom told me that in an ordinary family by admin (guest), 03 Feb 2018 14:27

I was small on the wall lettering, vowed to leave the house. I have no money, can only rely on reading, reading out, the farther the better from them. When I was in junior high school, my grade was the best of the whole grade. My dad insisted that I go to college. I was admitted to the city's best high school, my dad was ill the next year.

I was small on the wall lettering by Here (guest), 03 Feb 2018 14:26

Why is this so? I really do not like my family, I was a second-class citizen. For example, when no one was in the house, my grandmother insulted me with the hardest words and insulted my dad. I picked up a bucket of water and poured it on my body. My brother came and smiled at me. I packed my clothes and went to my dad Running unit, five or six years old ran ten kilometers, saw my dad, he only silently hugged me in his arms cry.

I really do not like my family by Homepage (guest), 03 Feb 2018 14:25
VaraxousVaraxous 26 Nov 2017 15:38
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » What Is Cuil Theory?


It isn't a party unless you summon a lesser demon.

by VaraxousVaraxous, 26 Nov 2017 15:38

Is it a unit vector? Is is a constant? pls elaborate

What is a Cuil? by NotALoveSongNotALoveSong, 04 Aug 2017 23:20 By the time the staff of the mission center came forward, the situation had reached a fever pitch.

This is not only the quarrel between the quarrel between the black sun and xiao yuan, but has become the antagonism between the higher and lower powers.

He also didn't expect the event to turn into such a subliminal way of keeping the original ink behind him, and he would be able to stand in the way if something didn't work out.

Looking at the firm arm in front of her, she felt a warm heart at the beginning of her life. It was also because of her that she could not give her the name.

Actually, this matter · · · the early ink came out of the back of Designer Belt, the words did not finish, was interrupted by xiao yuan.

While the mission center does not specify that the higher order can take on difficult tasks, it has become the default rule for many years.

Yes, go!

Hey! I don't see any of this, this man has a face!

No one could have imagined that this little incident had caused such a stir.

The atmosphere is always getting hotter and hotter.

Under the incitement of a few words, low power unite all of a sudden, usually by humiliation and unfair treatment to instantaneous intensity, on the some suddenly broke out!

So, he deliberately amplified the volume, and almost everyone heard it.

It's human nature to be in the crowd, and there is also a fifth order master, Designer Belt, and all eyes are on the way.

What, am I wrong? Seeing that everyone was watching him, felt a sense of superiority in his heart, and his tone became more and more rational. I want to do this with Designer Belt, we have to mix what we have.

This is the sentiment of many low - order powers, who are not well paid, and are often neglected and ignored by the most advanced powers. People are not all elemental powers!

Yes! Why do you come here in fifth order to take over the task? what do you mean? In the beginning of ink, he turned his head to the middle-aged man who had spoken, and he was so ordinary that he was filled with a thick and sullen air.

What do you mean? Xiao yuan pulled up the corners of his mouth, and his narrow eyes pointed upward. that's what he means! He's a five-order master, and he's running for c-level tasks, which is a shame!

Xiao, who has been practicing for nearly 40 years, has tried hard, and he is no worse than anyone. He will not lose to anyone. But the world is so unfair, so many years, he still at the second order edge lingers, how can also not step on the third order!

See Designer Belt again, when he was practicing this guy was not born! But now, he can even imagine the future of the bright future of the city of meryang. How can he be reconciled to his own problems?

One Cuil is that you give me a cow.
Two Cuils is that you give me milk.

Re: In Laymen's terms by rdococrdococ, 20 Jun 2017 23:55

My estimation is 55 Cuils, but it could be less.

Re: How many cuils is this? by rdococrdococ, 20 Jun 2017 23:51

I define Cuil as the distance between an idea, or object, as it is perceived, and an idea, or object, as it actually exists. This would mean that 0‽ is impossible to achieve by any living organism, and the majority of humans' lives are spent between the ranges of 0‽ and 1‽ - dreaming, for example, is the most common cause of higher Cuil in regular life.

Examples of 1‽ Cuil can be found in many figures of speech - "It's raining cats and dogs" is just one example.

This also means that it doesn't make sense to talk about negative Cuil - after all, how on earth can a being understand reality more than it actually is? Positive infinity Cuil does make sense, however - this occurs when your thoughts and sensations are completely unrelated to the idea, object or world you are trying to comprehend. This point is the singularity where all other unrelated perceptions differ by zero Cuil, rather than the negative infinity Cuil named the Reddye number, which makes even less sense to me than -1‽.

I'd also like to note that, contrary to the wiki page on 0‽, the existence of reality is actually somewhat up for debate. Some people hold that reality is an illusion; which would also mean that 0‽ is a meaningless construct. However, it's still a useful theoretical point.

Also noting that the higher the Cuil you're perceiving, the more possible ways your perception can differ from 0‽.

page »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License