I have been considering the Grand Mesh Theory for a while now, and I would like to suggest a different theory. This is, of course, completely speculative, and I'm not great mathematician, and certainly no philosopher, but I've been slowly constructing a theory concerning Negative Cuil.

I call it the Squint Theory.

First, imagine that all Reality can be viewed as such: |>.<|

At the period in between the two arrows I placed Zero Cuil, wherein reality is at its most real state. Now, on either side, imagine a number grid, with the right side being measured in (Positive) Cuil, and the left side being measured in, obviously, Negative Cuil. As you can see, there are some inherent problems with this theory (notably, the Reddye number cannot be accounted for), but this is only my first construction of this theory.

First, imagine that the two arrows are only two-dimensional cutaways of two fully three-dimensional funnels. Now, The open space between any two directly opposing points on the funnel is the measurement of that situation's Cuil. Thus, closer to the point there is less distance, and thus less Cuil, and farther away, more Cuil.

As well, in the Negative Funnel the same measurement can be applied to Negative Cuil. In this way, there can be a situation as hyper-real as a situation on opposite axis that is just as absurd. As well, the Funnels could be expounded upon, perhaps one side of the funnel representing certain types of situations while the other represents different ones. I am still not sure about this.

The final point I can speak about is the point of what I perceive to be infinte Cuil and negative infinite Cuil. In opposition to the Reddye number, I propose that these two funnels, much like proposed wormholes, shrink inwards circularly, and therefore expand outwards in infinitely increasing circles, both going outwards forever. However, I assume that these two funnel-ends are reaching towards asymptotes on both sides, those asymptotes being Infinite Cuil and Negative Infinte Cuil. This, of course, has a stark conflict with the reddye number. Please, input is necessary to help me with this point.

A further point. As you can imagine, the funnels expand in Cuil at an exponential rate, meaning that from a 1 Cuil situation to a 2 Cuil situation absurdity is more ably calculated, however, from 10 Cuil to 11 Cuil the perceived absurdity is not as easily differentiable. I believe this can be viewed in many situations, such as,

I pet my cat, he says "What a lovely day" (1 Cuil)

I pet my cat, he shakes my hand and congratulates me on solving the Rubik's Cube made of worms (2 Cuil)

the difference is noticeable. Now,

I pet my crocodile, which purrs as he tarries, late for his job as the Queen's official sexual conqueror, leader of the Marquis de Sade. (perhaps a 5 Cuil)

I pet my crocodile, which barks angrily, upsetting his elven village stomach, letting out sulfurous train tracks onto the clouds (perhaps a 6 Cuil)

In the first example, there is a clearly noticeable difference in absurdity, while in the second example the absurdity is not as clearly calculated. In other words, I believe that the absurdity needed to move a situation from Zero Cuil to 1 Cuil is miniscule in comparison to the absurdity necessary to move a 6 Cuil situation to a 7 Cuil situation. Thus, Cuil is exponential.

Please, help me expand my theory.