Greendye Paradox Theory
Forum » Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics » Greendye Paradox Theory
Started by: Jezza McFly (guest)
On: 1254443331|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Number of posts: 2
rss icon RSS: New posts
Summary:
If it follows that -∞‽ is a reality to unifying in its very nature that it explains everything at all times and in all places. Then ∞‽ should and must, unify and encompass nothing at all times in all places.
Greendye Paradox Theory
Jezza McFly (guest) 1254443331|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

If there is such a thing as a unified theory of everything, it is represented by the absolute negative lower bound of Cuil, as it is the most all-encompassing real thing possible.

1) If it follows that -∞‽ is a reality to unifying in its very nature that it explains everything at all times and in all places. Then ∞‽ should and must, unify and encompass nothing at all times in all places.

2) If one further believes that -∞‽ reduces the universe to a single point of absolute existence in the platonic sense, the absolute true form of an object, then ∞‽ expands the universe to an infinite number of points or objects. These infinite points or objects must encompass every subjective concept of everything in the most specific sense.

At ∞‽ no single thought, idea, or object can be applied to explain another though, idea, or object as every thought, idea, or object exists in a single plane of reality as it does in the infinite number of planes of reality described in Mesh Theory.

For example, if 5 dinner plates represent the infinite planes of reality in the Mesh:
Plate 1 has a pea on it
Plate 2 has an onion on it
Plate 3 has a steak on it
Plate 4 has a bone on it
Plate 5 has an egg on it
A plate at ∞‽ would have a pea, an onion, a steak, a bone, and an egg on it. And only on a plate at ∞‽ could all these things be on a single plate at a single time. What this means is that only at ∞‽ are all things everything at all times.

This is the basis of the Greendye Paradox Theory. How can ∞‽ unify and encompass nothing at all times and at all places, as shown in (1), but at the same time encompass all instances of everything in all the planes of reality, as shown in (2).

A possible solution comes from the next inference:

3) If one also believes that 0‽ cannot be attained because it is always moving towards -∞‽, then 0‽ or perfect reality is constantly moving away from ∞‽.

The first two observations combined with the third lead to a revelation that Cuil must operate along a space in which ∞‽ = -∞‽ yet simultaneously ∞‽ != -∞‽ (think of a mobius strip). This means that ∞‽ can be everything and nothing at the same time because its very nature means that is must be. The space along which Cuil operates can also be interpreted as chiral, in that it has two opposing sides: one where ∞‽ = -∞‽ and another where ∞‽ != -∞‽, this also fits with the idea of a mobius like formation.

Therefore, The Greendye Paradox Theory states that Cuil must operate along a space in which ∞‽ = -∞‽ yet simultaneously ∞‽ != -∞‽ and that ∞‽ can be everything and nothing at the same time because its very nature means that is must be, the same must be true for -∞‽.


Note: If this theory is accepted as credible, albeit in need of refinement, I think it could be the basis of a much more in depth theory towards a General Theory of Cuil.

unfold Greendye Paradox Theory by Jezza McFly (guest), 1254443331|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: Greendye Paradox Theory
AguyinachairAguyinachair 1255499249|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

I think you may have an incorrect assertion while confusing your terms.

As you state:
If it follows that -∞‽ is a reality to unifying in its very nature that it explains everything at all times and in all places. Then ∞‽ should and must, unify and encompass nothing at all times in all places.

I would argue however, that due to the relative duality of infinity, -∞‽ and ∞‽ must by definition nullify one another in a glorious conflagration of reality. It is accepted that -∞‽ is a reality so unifying that it explains all things at all times in all places, but the dual opposite of this, which would by its existence stand as -∞‽'s undoing, would be a reality so chaotic and surreal that it segregates all things at all times in all places.

It would then lead into your second statement much more fluidly that:

"2) If one further believes that -∞‽ reduces the universe to a single point of absolute existence in the platonic sense, the absolute true form of an object, then ∞‽ expands the universe to an infinite number of points or objects. These infinite points or objects must encompass every subjective concept of everything in the most specific sense."

To then lead into your dinner plate example:

A table set with plates of -∞‽ would be the singular existence of all foods upon a single plate, and that plate itself set upon a single plate, which is then upon a single table, all within the same singularity of existence layered upon all realities, causing Leibniz's Identity of Indiscernibleness much discomfort.

A table set with plates of ∞‽ would be the separation of all foods onto all plates, such that all plates contain all foods, and simultaneously rest on all tables which exist within all realities. One could argue that the pure act of infinitely separating reality into unique parts would lead to the negation of those parts; which is in fact oddly enough what your assertion is about ∞‽ in the first place, that being:

∞‽ should and must, unify and encompass nothing at all times in all places.

Such a coincidence is not one of small consequence. I believe the solution to this Greendye paradox is that indeed, the existence of all things spontaneously in all realities spread upon all infinities leads to the nullification of reality, and the decent into a chaotic mess of surreality*.

I look forward to further discussion of this paradox. I hope my terms were closer to 0‽ than what I usually write. I believe that by knowing our limits of cuil, we can more thoroughly come to appreciate the subtleties in its existence.
__

*Cuil theorists surmise that Sarah Palin winning the 2012 Presidential election will in fact bring this to result. We can only pray for salvation.*

last edited on 1259002877|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by Aguyinachair + show more
unfold Re: Greendye Paradox Theory by AguyinachairAguyinachair, 1255499249|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
New post
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License