What do you folks think will work as a system of operations for Cuil?

I have an intuition(so take it with a grain of salt), that operations for Cuil should be considered from the viewpoint that Cuil is, to some extent, the difference between things. As such, it may be possible to do accurate calculations of such things as infinite as difference with some powerful system of logic, such as calculus and programming languages. It should still be possible to calculate variables of specific Cuil systems using algebraic methods. This is akin to the Ability to calculate variables in a system for mechanics by simple using algebra, much of which is derivable from more complex equations taking advantage of Calculus.

of course to do this we would first need to connect cuils to other fields of algebra.

Could Cuils work in a sine/cosine-like fashion? Where they have a maximum +/- Cuil…icity? Say there is a certain point where it cannot be further from the original subject. This is only inevitable because there are a finite number of subjects to change from, so at some point it will have to start becoming more realistic. Like, if we started with a duck and then moved to a chicken to a cow to a monkey to a human to a tree to a tractor to a planet to space to atoms, at some point we would have to start coming back. There would be a common denominator, such as all things are comprised of atoms so it's not possible to get further away from atoms (quarks blah blah blah, it still ends). Then there is also a finite - number as Cuilicity approaches absolute realism. Think about it.

how exactly does one define one "thing" that changes? would one cuil be replacing your friend with fluorine gas? or would it be turning him into an ape? or making him into your mother? changing his hair color? giving him a cold? or maybe just replacing one of his atoms with one of a different type? because not only are these changes drastically different scalarly, but one could be comprised of others. For instance, if you make the argument that one cuil is the flourine gas *and* the atom changing, then one could argue that changing him into flourine gas is, in effect, changing all of his atoms, so if changing one atom is a cuil, then logically changing several billion atoms, by changing him into flourine gas, should be several billion cuils.

I think that for the purposes of standardization we should define the field of cuils as a vector space, that supports all vector operations.

what about quadratic cuils? it would gradually go through the levels of cuil untill the highest level is reached, then once it is complete everything that has been done will be reversed in the same amount of time sense the quadratic in graph form creates a parabola. but then as it goes through negitive cuil you then go through levels of both -cuil and both cuil(i). im prolly looking at this wrong, im looking at it from a graphing view point of view.

another theory on negative Cuils

A negative Cuil represents a system where a level of absurdity to normalizes to the desired outcome - it's an inverse function of the positive Cuil.

Let me illustrate:

If you asked me for a hamburger, but it turns out I don't really exist. Where I was originally standing, a picture of a hamburger rests on the ground.

-1 Cuil: You desire a hamburger. You ask for a racoon. I give you a hamburger.

-2 Cuils: You desire a hamburger. You ask an imaginary entity for a hamburger and place a picture of a hamburger on the ground. I give you a hamburger.

and so on.

Here's the exciting implication from this understanding of negative Cuils - human religious behavior is at approximately -2 Cuils.

A negative Cuil represents a system where absurdity tends normalizes to the desired outcome - it's an inverse function of the positive Cuil.

Let me illustrate:

-1 Cuil: You desire a hamburger. You ask for a racoon. I give you a hamburger.

-2 Cuils: You desire a hamburger. You ask an imaginary entity for a hamburger and place a picture of a hamburger on the ground. I give you a hamburger.

and so on.

Here's the exciting implication from this understanding of negative Cuils - human religious behavior is at approximately -2 Cuils.

Why can't cuils be more simple? I like how a cuil is the difference between two situations but what is the purpose of all this math? A practical use for cuils could be in the multiverse where we define separate universes with cuils to determine how far away they are from our reality.

I don't understand how u get a cuil too. Is it just one difference between situations? And at a universal level shouldn't it be a logarithmic equation to determine the cuil level rather than individual cuils?

I'm sorry but none of this makes sense. I don't get how you turn a qualitative value into a quantitative value and still do math accordingly. It logically doesn't make sense. How can you take one statement like "I eat a hamburger with a side of rainbows" and determine the cuil value?

I propose its based off of something called MR's or misrelativities. For each statement, a certain number of MR's are given, from a number 0-2.

They are determined by the 4 lines in a circle. The diameter is directly linked to the circle, or the reality. A chord would be .5 which partially fulfills the reality. A tangent would be 1 which has connections to the reality but it is indirectly connected. Then a random line that does not touch the circle would be 2 MR's where the statement is not relative to the reality at all. Then a conversion table between MR's and Cuil level will be made based off of the burger situation.

Then 1.5 MR's would be given if a statement has 1 partially relative idea and 1 non relative idea

In the burger situation, the 1st cuil level would have an MR value of 0.5 because the reality is partially being fulfilled.

The second cuil level, the MR value would be 2.5 because the reality is partially being fulfilled with the picture of the burger but there is the statement of nonexistent which has nothing to do with the reality of the situation, thus adding 2 MR's.

The third cuil level has 3 MR's because there are 3 statements that are not directly correlated with the reality, but through multiple conmections, they are partially related.

The fourth cuil level has 8.5 MR's. The German portion gives 2 due to no relation with the reality. Then the next 3 statements have 1.5 MR because they have one portion partially relative and 1 portion not relative. Then the last statement adds two because it is non relative.

As you head further up the cuil scale and get into more than 4 cuils, the number of misrepativities drastically increases. This will make a definite standard to how we measure the cuil level of a situation.

I understand how we get

sin^2(theta)+cos^2(theta)=1

But I don't understand the whole

Sin^2(cuil)+cos^2(cuil)=1.618

Can someone please explain this? Is this just something that I haven't learned in scuil (school) yet?