Travis (guest) 1229354845|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
…that one can find a use for all the acid one did in college. This is encouraging. The funniest line was the one about entropy occurring as you peruse all the information contained within the universe.
Raoul (guest) 1233056962|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
this is all a joke, right?
Sloan (guest) 1239782259|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
The solution lies deep in the Sobolev's Space of Generalized Functions, with possible inclusion of sigma-algebras….
Sloan (guest), 1239782259|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Interrobang (guest) 1242521076|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
My fearsomeness is debatable, my awesomeness is indisputable, and I am not in use for mathematical reasons as far as I know either. Jus' sayin'. :)
Bryan (guest) 1244211817|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
If only this unit of measurement had been available to me in art school!
yavar (guest) 1247702172|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
I was wondering how negative cuil works for a true statement like "you asked for a hamburger and I gave you one." what would be a step away from abstraction towards reality for a true statement? It seems to this would only make sense if it works in one direction, away from reality, and then possibly back towards it.
Jacob (guest) 1248237718|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
So many perspectives to consider, even the differing associations would still generate a huge variation on a cuil step. This is definitely a task for computers. We need to study a huge variety of humans while giving thought to the use of communication and emotion, and then generate a cuil step which is rather more like a probability distribution of potential perspectives (big data). Really this is more like the thermodynamics of semantics in this media.. semantics has a long way to go before we arrive there. In our ant-like progression we as a race will get there, but no-one at that point will understand it… not that we understand anything individually anymore anyway…
Jacob (guest), 1248237718|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
