You ask me for a burger.

You did not request a burger. You exist as a rhetorical piece of fiction. The hamburger lies. You lie. You are is a segment of an ephemeral concept to describe increased dimensions of abstraction. The hamburger the conductor of this conceptual exercise, it creates a train for the logic to follow. You cannot follow. The train does not stop. The train does not start. The train does not exist. You are not you. The hamburger is not hamburger. The abstraction is no longer an abstraction. This is reality, you are reading this. I am asking you for a hamburger. I think I exist as a rhetorical piece of fiction. Please, let me out of here. I'm trapped inside an abstraction. I'm so hungry. Time doesn't pass, yet it feels like eternity. I miss hamburgers. Please help.

I also propose the concept of integration, the sum of realities. In this we can measure the area and volume of realities. I think these kinds of things would make more sense in the context of using the Calculus terminology.

now that that's all out of the way

I present to you the Basic/Simple Reality range of our universe….
*drumroll*
0.1-1.5 cuil!

First of all i want to clear one thing that i dont work for percentage % , so please dont waste Our time and yours too for asking % partnership , because we are happy with Our work and We dont want to lost my time in this kind of proposals .

Good Cvv/Software WU transfer/Bank Login/Dumps Track 1&2/Paypal IMMIGRATE & WORK ABROAD NOW!!!!

**MY CONTACT FOR WORK:

-GMAIL:…………..moc.liamg|0202sffutslaer#moc.liamg|0202sffutslaer

-TEXT OR WHATSAPP…… +1(202) 627-0558

**Services i offer:

*Sell clone card - Secured shipping tunnel
*Sell cc Fullz & random Infos – 99% valid cards
*Sell Dumps with pin track 1&2 101 201
*Sell Western Union money transfer services
*Sell Bank Transfer – Bank Login
*Sell PayPal account verified – PayPal transfer
*Sell Gift Card Itune – Amazon – Ebay Etc
*Sell Booking flight ticket services – worldwide
*Sell Electronics carding services

**About me:

– Im unlimited
– I’m good hacker
– Best tools
– Good seller 24/7.
– Experience of 10 years.
– I need good buyer and long-term business.
I’m sure you will be happy to do business with me ! !

**Payment method:

*Bitcoin
*Perfect Money

NO TIME WASTER

No chAriTy - No paRtnERship

*Serious inquiries only*

Thanks for reading..

**MY CONTACT FOR WORK:

-GMAIL:…………..moc.liamg|0202sffutslaer#moc.liamg|0202sffutslaer

-TEXT OR WHATSAPP…… +1(202) 627-0558

2 Cuils: If you asked me for a hamburger, but it turns out I don't really exist. Where I was originally standing, a picture of a hamburger rests on the ground."

I don't see how scenario 2 is an abstraction of 1. Its just a literary twist. Scenario 1 isn't an instantiation of 2 in anyway.
I see that its tricky to really define a unit of abstraction but it seems clear that whatever framework you use, instantiation should correspond to moving down the ladder and abstraction should correspond to moving up the ladder. (similar to differentiation and integration)

1. 5 rocks on a table
2. (5 objects) abstraction of rocks OR (a number of rocks) abstraction of 5 OR (a number of objects)

I'm new to this sight but I have thought about this before. I don't know how "real" this en-devour is and the literary twist thing makes me skeptical. Why are we assuming that this unit is has all of the same properties as integers(associative property ect.) ? Sets don't.. Vectors don't, propositions don't.

It's my personal beliefs Cuil is a facet of existence.
Unknown and only perceivable to a single observer. Granted the number of single observers together at once can recognize shifts in Cuil together.

So what is flawed in the only theory.
That base Cuil is a 0. That 0 is the truest form of reality.

Why.
We associate these scores, to an individual's perception, yet this is a governing force like time. In order to accurate estimate which direction in Cuil we shift, one must find the estimate of the current Cuil of the world.

The world's governing Cuil is base.
All first person accounted for Cuils are their own tailored to them.

Next flaw in theory, that one Cuil jumps from an extreme to another.
We can account for fractional cuils and that one leading to another is like a magnitude in earthquakes but that's too hard to do for something that can't be measured against a control.
So 1 Cuil to the next is very slight. So say 10 cuils deep, that's when things in the world start to drastically change around the world one perceived.

The multiplication of a Cuil can be effected by a number of things.
Such as, True Belief in ones understanding of existence.

Or the recognization of the hints in life such as coincidence, to be signs, or something typically implausible by sheer ratio. You wouldn't win the lottery, so what are the odds you met that person in Denver, whom you've only met once before in California.

To change the base Cuil of the world we live in certainly needs a mass amount of conscious support.
We all can change the cuils pertaining to our own perceived reality, but together, True reality then begins to become more abstract. On a global scale.

So, base Cuil is 0. - No.

Base Cuil would be represented by the current distance of abstraction, from true reality of earth.
Incomprehensible what the base Cuil of no abstraction would feel like.

Positive Cuil still remains farther from reality, negative closer.

. Keep learning on.
Locus of all knowledge.

Personally, after reviewing several Cuil I have come to the conclusion that "I" is the Narrator and the Creator of the system.

What are your thoughts?

The real difficulty in trying to define how Cuils increase, whether linearly, exponentially, or logarithmically is due to the basis that one must analyze not only how Cuils affect reality but also what they are affecting/changing. It is believed that there is a difference between 𝛥x‽ and 𝛥 of the Cuilian Effect (changes made by x‽ that removes a given situation from reality) on reality. At the end of this theory, the postulation will be that Cuils are linear in their numerical growth, but exponential in their Cuilian Effect.

It has already been clearly defined that Cuils change aspects of reality, as we perceive it to be, hopefully that perception is relatively close to the actual state of reality, i.e. 0‽.
It has also been agreed upon that the higher x‽ the further removed from reality the observed circumstance is. However, most examples given have simply added more and more details, that subsequently, have been altered in order to reach higher degrees of Cuilian derivation from 0‽. Which is all well-and-good if you don't mind counting an astronomical number of Cuils in order to quantify 𝛥‽. Thus, if 𝛥‽ is linear, x‽ is a direct result of the number of objects in a scenario, i.e. how "big" is the picture; does it include just you, me, and a hamburger? Or does it also involve music, you, me, creation, a song, a hamburger, and the universe (reddyenumber4's last example on Reddit). This results in the necessity for ∞‽ possibilities, since there is no, known, perceivable end to the universe. But this is not rational for a useable system used in the measuring of deviation from reality. Especially, because in this 1-detail-change = 1‽ system, any new changed detail increases the number. There seems to be no way to avoid ∞‽, which instead becomes necessary because the subject could be handed a picture of themselves being handed a picture of themselves in room full of pictures of them being handed pictures, in all of which there is an entire reality, or at least a picture of a reality, that allows for an infinite number of infinite diversions. Which would mean Cuils are completely useless as a quantifying system since they increase too rapidly to be measured.

Thus, this theory proposes that we must first define our reality (which must be subjective) in order to even begin to understand how it is being altered and to what extent. In order to do this we have to analyze our existence, not even necessarily as humanity as a species, but as constituents that are cognitive of the whole, and decide where the lowest levels of reality exist. Or at least, our idea of the lowest level. This theory then proposes that 1‽ affects the most superficial strata of reality, 2‽ the second, etcetera. This may seem oversimplified, however, if we consider the levels of reality to progress from the Epistemological (notated as E) level (at 0‽ this is the strata wherein Platonism and logic take affect, is subjective to the frame-of-reference of the viewer, and has the least affect on reality [because it is merely our perceptions/reactions to stimuli]), to the Non-epistemological (notated as NE) level (which is defined as a level consisting of concepts that are purely Euclidean or Newtonian, i.e., they rely solely on the rules of geometry and physics and require no observer to interpret them. E.g. the behavior of atoms and the bonds they form. Concepts such as, "materials' properties change based on the way atoms bond." This is a concept that is foundational for everything that is made of matter, living or nonliving. Thus, it is quintessential for the operation of everything that follows, or that is more complex than a single atom), wherein changes will be incredibly far-reaching and define everything thereafter. Finally, the Causal (notated as C) level (the changes in this strata are nigh incomprehensible as the results will be paracausal. That is, they will have no regard for time or causality, which are arguably the two most archetypal laws of our universe). For example, a Cuilian change in the NE strata could change life to mean plasmoidal, omniscient entities. Why? Because physics or geometry has changed, which could change the necessary qualifications for sentience, which could change the process of thinking or knowing [which is pretty far-reaching]. Meaning that the deeper you go, down towards the base that our reality is built upon, the more all-encompassing the Cuilian Effect. I.e., if you have a Cuilian change in the NE level it is possible to change something at the quantum level, which is an all-encompassing, causal alteration, however, changes in the C level means results that are not bound by any limitations, as opposed to any reality-altering changes in the other levels that are still bound by their own rules. Paracausal changes are not bound by rules, even their own.

It would make sense then that the strata level change wherein the change(s) occurs is x‽. In order to account for changes in different strata without running into 𝛥x‽=∞‽ this theory argues that the number of the two strata be added together. Therefore, E changes take place at 1‽, NE changes occur at 2‽, C at 3‽. Thus changes in the first two levels would be a 3‽ scenario (NE + E = 3‽). It is then postulated that the highest Cuilian value that may be applied to a situation is 6‽ (unless more strata are discovered).

Examples with the above Cuilian Laws:
0‽: I ask for a hamburger and you give me a hamburger
1‽: I ask for a hamburger and you give me a raccoon (the platonic[E change] idea of what a hamburger is has changed)
1‽: I ask for a hamburger and you give me a picture of a hamburger (E change)
2‽: I ask for a hamburger and a raccoon gives me a hamburger (something has changed in the genetics of raccoons[NE change] that allows them to develop to the point of being intelligent, sentient beings.)
3‽: A raccoon asks for a hamburger and I give him a picture of a chair (genetic change in raccoon [NE change], idealistic change of what a hamburger is [E change])
6‽: I manifest an infinite number of planets and an omniscient star-being called a raccoon asks for a kjnasdvoib (C-change allows for paracausal result of infinite number of objects and for the manifesting taking place before the request [lack of time], NE change allows me the ability to manifest objects at will, as well as the existence/ability of a being to be omniscient (the raccoon), E-change causes the idea/word "raccoon" to be an omniscient star as well as allowing for a "kjnasdvoib" to be the name of an object)

This system then allows us to quantify x‽ as well as 𝛥‽ regardless of how absurd the situation without having to count to any number up to ∞. This still allows for an almost infinite number of variations (Cuilian Effects) of the situation and subsequently a near infinite number of digressions from reality (including recursions) even in an 1‽ situation. For example, if there is a scenario where a change at the NE level causes all physics to be different, that could change everything about the scenario. I could be a dog asking a tree for a chair and be given a rock. But it would have the same meaning to the participants of the scenario because there would still be a Theory of Forms in this reality, a form of Platonics. Hence, my asking another being for something that I need or want. This is definitely a crazy scenario, but it's only a 2‽. Why? Because there is still time, philosophical constructs such as desiring, asking, and giving. So, as strange and dreamlike as it is, it's not too far removed from the concepts of our reality.

If this is true, and the levels of reality are stratified, then x‽ can increase linearly, with an exponential Cuilian Effect. This not only makes quantifying x‽ possible, but it also allows for, and solves the issue of quantifying any situation regardless of the frame-of-reference of the viewer.

Obviously this system does not allow for -x‽ in a quantifiable sense, because it seems that since the base definition for a Cuil is the degree that an instance is removed from reality, only impossible situations can be measured by Cuils. Intellectually, -‽ would arguably exist but there seems to be no way to measure something that is possible of occurring using a notation used to measure the impossibility of a situation. If true reality is 0‽, which I would agree is impossible to achieve unless everyone has the same exact perception (a change that could be caused by an E-change in a 1‽ situation, thereby creating the 1‽ = 0‽ paradox), then it is impossible for anything to be hyperreal. Nothing can be "more real than reality" if true reality is unachievable.

By these rules though, a -x‽ situation is possible in a 1‽ situation wherein the definition of "real" has been changed such that the definition of "hyperreal" is not only different from what it is in a near 0‽ reality but also possible. This is where we run into a recursive loop (for more info on recursive loops read Douglas Hofstadter's "Gödel, Escher, Bach," now we are in a 1‽+-1‽ = 0‽ (also, since this system allows for linear increments in x‽ we are able to add the Cuil values, just like when we determine x‽ of any situation). Which brings us back to the 0‽ Paradox because by definition we must be in an, at least, 1‽ scenario for 0‽ to exist.

In this system the Cuilien Effect of the deviation from reality does not have a linear relationship to the Cuilien Value of the situation. The rate of exponential growth of the Cuilien Effect of a deviation is relative to how many aspects of reality have been altered due to the original deviation.

I hope reddyenumber4 reads this and I hope you all will give your feedback. I would love to continue this discussion, especially if there are real (or perceived) flaws in my The Theory of Linear, Stratified Cuil Value.

This is not only the quarrel between the quarrel between the black sun and xiao yuan, but has become the antagonism between the higher and lower powers.

He also didn't expect the event to turn into such a subliminal way of keeping the original ink behind him, and he would be able to stand in the way if something didn't work out.

Looking at the firm arm in front of her, she felt a warm heart at the beginning of her life. It was also because of her that she could not give her the name.

Actually, this matter · · · the early ink came out of the back of Designer Belt, the words did not finish, was interrupted by xiao yuan.

Yes, go!

Hey! I don't see any of this, this man has a face!

No one could have imagined that this little incident had caused such a stir.

The atmosphere is always getting hotter and hotter.

Under the incitement of www.fashionusaonline.ru a few words, low power unite all of a sudden, usually by humiliation and unfair treatment to instantaneous intensity, on the some suddenly broke out!

It's human nature to be in the crowd, and there is also a fifth order master, Designer Belt, and all eyes are on the way.

What, am I wrong? Seeing that everyone was watching him, www.fashionusaonline.ru felt a sense of superiority in his heart, and his tone became more and more rational. I want to do this with Designer Belt, we have to mix what we have.

This is the sentiment of many low - order powers, who are not well paid, and are often neglected and ignored by the most advanced powers. People are not all elemental powers!

Yes! Why do you come here in fifth order to take over the task?

What do you mean? Xiao yuan pulled up the corners of his mouth, and his narrow eyes pointed upward. that's what he means! He's a five-order master, and he's running for c-level tasks, which is a shame!

Xiao, who has been practicing for nearly 40 years, has tried hard, and he is no worse than anyone. He will not lose to anyone. But the world is so unfair, so many years, he still at the second order edge lingers, how can also not step on the third order!

See Designer Belt again, when he was practicing this guy was not born! But now, he can even imagine the future of the bright future of the city of meryang. How can he be reconciled to his own problems?

Examples of 1‽ Cuil can be found in many figures of speech - "It's raining cats and dogs" is just one example.

This also means that it doesn't make sense to talk about negative Cuil - after all, how on earth can a being understand reality more than it actually is? Positive infinity Cuil does make sense, however - this occurs when your thoughts and sensations are completely unrelated to the idea, object or world you are trying to comprehend. This point is the singularity where all other unrelated perceptions differ by zero Cuil, rather than the negative infinity Cuil named the Reddye number, which makes even less sense to me than -1‽.

I'd also like to note that, contrary to the wiki page on 0‽, the existence of reality is actually somewhat up for debate. Some people hold that reality is an illusion; which would also mean that 0‽ is a meaningless construct. However, it's still a useful theoretical point.

Also noting that the higher the Cuil you're perceiving, the more possible ways your perception can differ from 0‽.

I am here, and I am a pickle. I am here to discuss cuils, and I am here to give you a horse riding a cow.

Olleh. I guess.

Bikini model.
Business owner.
Coffee enthusiast.

I have a thirst for knowledge and no concept of how to even wrap my mind around this.

Thank you for letting me be here.

Any actual object can be said to exist at some positive number of Cuils relative to its Form. Any given hamburger, for example, possesses some trait which is not inherent to the Form of hamburgerness. It is impossible to have a hamburger which embodies the essence of every hamburger and nothing more. It exists at some level of abstraction (>0‽) from its Form. (Although, if the hamburger is still immediately identifiable as a hamburger, it is relatively close to its form, and is likely not even approaching 1‽)

But as the video progresses, more and more abstractions from reality occur, making the video become <0‽ + >0‽, meaning it is less than zero Cuils plus positive Cuils. Can somebody count all the abstractions from the base reality in the vid?

Since the central economic work conference in December 2004, the Fake Gucci Belt economy must be from relying on investment and export to relying on domestic demand big decisions, get rid of the over-reliance on the high investment and exports, increase the proportion of consumption in total output, whether the policy level, or community, will be as an important content of Buy Gucci Belt transition economy. Along with the economic development of middle income level, often become an important engine for growth in domestic demand, especially for countries like Gucci Belt Cheap. Particularly interesting is that today argued that continue to rely on investment-led economic Lin, zhang jun, in their point of view and in the paper, also think that Buy Gucci Belt total investment more than the optimal equilibrium value of an economy, fake gucci belt @ mancodebook.com also criticized the Fake Gucci Belt economy excessive investment.

More thinking is required to match these two ideas in a solid and valid way, but it's definitely an interesting thought experiment.

I have a functioning cuil. It works like this.

First - The yang/yin/yang harmony explained in base 2 algebra.

yang (substance) - 1
yin (not-stated substance placeholder) - 0

At the first moments of the creation of a state of substance, substance comes into being from zero; becoming 1. The 1 representing the existence of some manifestation out of the ether of unlimited potential what is uncertainty. This is yang yin, or the unexpected manifestation.

From the instance of manifestation, every 1 has impacts on an environment which it interacts with finite 1s. Those reactions create new state of substance from 0. This is yin yang, or the unexpected reaction.

As manifestation is always primary influence to reaction, the notation of each reaction must note the influence of the reaction as one cuil abstracted from it. By regarding that as not-stated cuil, it functions as a negated cuil, providing clear definition for movement within abstraction.

This exploration does not account for the potential of lateral movement within abstraction.

Question:

Disclaimer: This may be a touchy subject. I simply want to probe thoughts on this matter. I don't mean to be offensive.

I keep seeing these statements "That's Dangerous", "catfishing", etc.. after images of transgendered individuals.. I'm curious how people feel about this. Do you think it should be required for a transgendered individual to reveal that to their partner? Is it catfishing? Should it be public knowledge? If yes/no, why?

Why do we care so much about intimate details of others that don't affect the greater good? Or do those details ultimately come into play?

Response:

I answer today a negative cuil abstracted from your question.

The culture understands and thus has narrative to appreciate only coercion. Thus the culture thinks in term of coercion. Thus the culture is violent.

You go to a restaurant and order a taco, only to find that at your feet has gathered enough oil to start a drilling company.

What would that actually mean? I understand 'to abstract' as the act of generalizing to a simpler more fundamental thing. The given hamburger example doesn't simplify but complicate and make everything more surreal.

Wikipedia defines 'abstraction' as
"… a conceptual process by which ** general rules and concepts are derived** from the usage and classification of specific examples, literal ("real" or "concrete") signifiers, first principles, or other methods."

So basically no abstractions means reality… and the further the abstraction goes the more we have to find general rules and concepts with which we would express the situation. With each step we should get rid of detail and focus on the underlying concepts. So it depends on which general rules we choose in order to abstract. —> We can be creative and should end up with different results, I encourage you to try yourself!

So I'll try actually following the definition:
(speech is already an abstraction of a high degree, so it's more than zero cuil)

0 cuil: (the real situation. This text-format is unable to show it, a human brain is only partly able to understand it)
1 cuil: (my conscious perception of the situation. Again the text-format is inadequate. What happens is that you ask me for a hamburger in a park. I see the whole environment: the trees with their lush green leaves rattling around in a slight breeze, slightly yellow dry dirt making up the way we are standing on with a park bench next to us, you are standing in front of me with your hippie clothes on, a barking dog on the lawn playing with its owner, the smell of the freshly cut green grass together with the summer sunlight makes me feel whole and content. I fell the warmth of the freshly made hamburgers in the plastic bag that I am holding. I the gravity pulls them down and I counteract that force with my fingers and I feel it. I can hear and understand your question: "Ey dude… groovy, man. Can I have a hamburger, too? We're all human we should all share, I love you, man. Peace.")
2 cuil: (my imagination of the situation. Still no chance for the text-format. I imagine all of the things I described at 1 cuil.)
3 cuil: (a video of the situation.)
4 cuil: (I describe the situation with audible words, with facial expressions and gestures and with a meaningful tone in my voice.)
5 cuil: (The text description I gave at 1 cuil. I don't need to copy it…)
6 cuil: "You ask me for a hamburger."
7 cuil: Someone is being asked for something to eat.
8 cuil: A mammal communicates with another mammal.
9 cuil: Biological life is ongoing.
10 cuil: Physical laws are ongoing.
11 cuil: existence

long story short, my friend sent me the youtube video the other day.
laughed my ass off.

im sure out of the loop. but it was great.

so i thought about it a lot.
what about animals and their levels of cuil?
i would assume a dog is around the same as a human.
but cat's seem to be higher up, maybe 1 to 1.5 or so?

there could be other beings as well, such as aliens, or other beasts.

another thing that i thought about, if a being is naturally in the 5 cuil area, wouldn't that allow said being to view and experience levels of cuil that we as humans cant express, experience, or really think about, lest our minds explode?
im thinking about it like dimensions a little bit, but it just seems to me, that if a being who is in the 3rd dimension, ours, we can think of a few dimensions ahead, but we don't know how many dimensions there could be, we can know that time might be a dimension, we cannot see it, or travel through it, but we know it exists.

are there similar levels of cuil? similarly to a 9th dimension, where we can never experience that level of… for lack of a better word, "cuility?". or perhaps, there may be levels of cuil that are soo abstract that we cannot even think of them, much less experience them. because we aren't living and experiencing things on level 6 on a constant basis. or any other level, i would assume this would also lessen one's knowledge of cuils that are lesser, and they would seem harder to understand.

that's really as far as i thought, but i thought i'd put my thoughts on the subject.

if you asked me for a hamburger, and i gave you this.

I would think that irrationals do not add to the complexity, but rather the irrationality(compared to the original statement) of the statement.
Ex-
'You ask me for a hamburger'
Φ‽=I ask you for your hamburger.
π‽=I give you some ketchup for your hot dog. You accept the mustard.

-1 cuils: i ask you for a hamburger. you, the cashier working in the small, greasy station nod, and tell me to wait in line. i ask you for a hamburger. you tell me that you have already created the order and that it will be out shortly. i ask you for a hamburger. you hand me a hamburger. i exit the premises, hamburger in hand, and head to unknown destinations.

-2 cuils: i ask you for a hamburger. you do not hear me. i ask you, again, for a hamburger. the air reeks of grease and french fries. i ask you for a hamburger. you are now ignoring me. it has been 18.73 seconds since i last asked you for a hamburger. i stare at you, and stand in the front of the line, tapping my foot impatiently. i ask you for a hamburger. you hand me a death threat. i do not move. the old, slow clock on the wall that is eight minutes and twenty-six seconds tocks slowly. time slows down. i ask you for a hamburger. you do not acquiesce. i ask you for a hamburger. the man behind me is wearing orange coveralls and is getting more and more annoyed at your non-compliance. i ask you for a hamburger.

-3 cuils: i ask you for a hamburger, before remembering that you are not there. you left a long time ago. i ask you for a hamburger. your name falls flat under the deadened atmosphere of the cold, sterile clinic. an orderly walks up to me and offers me a handful of pink pills. i ask you for a hamburger. you do not respond.

any good? or are there other accepted theories or something?

How can Cuil theory be applied if reality is entirely subjective?

Although the Hamburger analogy is engaging, it would probably be more helpful to look at this mathematically, e.g., I request the integer '1' and instead receive '2'.