Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: the 8th Cuil ]]>

Forum category: Off Topic Forums / OT Forums

Forum thread: asd ]]>

Forum category: Off Topic Forums / OT Forums

Forum thread: asd ]]>

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Electronics are only known to beings that do not exist.

You exist only while Bluetooth is being invented.

You can only invent Bluetooth technology by turning off the Bluetooth function on your phone.

Because your phone believes that it has

Bluetooth, it never can.

The advent of Bluetooth prevents it from ever existing.

You are scheduled to exist as soon as Bluetooth is invented.

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy

Forum thread: Cuil Generator ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy

Forum thread: As we gaze upon the great mesh of the universe it becomes clear ]]>

EXAMPLE:

1 Cuil; The hamburger that you gave me sprouts legs.

2 Cuils; The hamburger that you gave me sprouts legs and carries the Olympic torch all the way from Olympia, Greece to the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio.

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: In Laymen's terms ]]>

But as the video progresses, more and more abstractions from reality occur, making the video become <0‽ + >0‽, meaning it is less than zero Cuils plus positive Cuils. Can somebody count all the abstractions from the base reality in the vid?

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: Cuil count of Doompy Poomp? ]]>

Since the central economic work conference in December 2004, the Fake Gucci Belt economy must be from relying on investment and export to relying on domestic demand big decisions, get rid of the over-reliance on the high investment and exports, increase the proportion of consumption in total output, whether the policy level, or community, will be as an important content of Buy Gucci Belt transition economy. Along with the economic development of middle income level, often become an important engine for growth in domestic demand, especially for countries like Gucci Belt Cheap. Particularly interesting is that today argued that continue to rely on investment-led economic Lin, zhang jun, in their point of view and in the paper, also think that Buy Gucci Belt total investment more than the optimal equilibrium value of an economy, fake gucci belt @ mancodebook.com also criticized the Fake Gucci Belt economy excessive investment.

Forum category: Off Topic Forums / OT Forums

Forum thread: Imbalance of @ http://mancodebook.com/ ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy

Forum thread: Is not the most real thing possible, the observer? ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions

Forum thread: Hello there! ]]>

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

That was the example, and the reality of the situation. If I decided to give you a hamburger as well, I think that would take us above 0 cuils' difference from you just asking for one; just not necessarily a whole cuil's difference, relative to this example, which seems catered to our known reality in human culture. Most folks probably aren't too surprised if they perceived to have received a hamburger after asking for one, since most of us don't usually ask people for a hamburger unless we think we can potentially get one by doing so.

Or maybe it's the opposite. Maybe, relative to all of reality (not just our culture), as encompassed in the infinite possibilities of the 'me' variable you're asking a hamburger of; it could be even more abstract than a raccoon, to receive a hamburger, since we usually ask someone we we trust will be more hospitable to our hamburger needs, rather than asking a variable of infinite, possible forms and responses, including a lack thereof; also, including the receiving of a hamburger, on your part. Though, from my seemingly limited perception (the person writing this), it seems unlikely to receive a hamburger in such a variable context.

Absolute cuil is something different than 0 cuil maybe? idk, really. The idea is interesting. It just depends how we want to set up our units of measurement and stuff; but again, idk. Time to get some sleep :)

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: Psychiatric conditions and their relation to Cuil ]]>

Zero cuil is like a bunch of clues without a detective. The information is there, and any number of possible logical or illogical conclusions/experiences are possible, but no one is drawing conclusions/experiencing.

It is the absence of experience and every experience at once, where every experience is one experience and every experience has been experienced but has never been experienced. Like a light particle that is simultaneously observed and unobserved, and thus simultaneously a wave and a particle and thus cannot exist and yet hyper-exists.

I think zero cuil exists simultaneously with +infinite cuil and -infinite cuil at all times in all situations, since pure chaos and pure order are both singularities of nothingness and zero cuil is the singularity of what Is.

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: Zero Cuil ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy

Forum thread: Help With a Problem I have Concerning Cuil ]]>

In my understanding of your theory, the funnels around Zero Cuil (>.<) expand outward at a possibly exponential rate to the point at which we cease to be able to imagine a possibility as a permutation of 'reality' (represented by zero cuil.) I propose that they then funnel back in to both the positive infinity point and the reddye number, where experience becomes either so logical (reddye) or so illogical (+infinite cuil) that it is completely unimaginable. Thus the squinting diagram would appear such (+)-< >.< >+(-), with both -infinite and +infinite cuil occuring at the same singularity on this cyclical line.

I rationalize this thusly;

When an experience is experienced completely logically (reddye), it ceases to be truthful to 'reality' (0 cuil) and becomes completely theoretical. The example of the circle above works here; when a circle is expressed as 'real-ly' as possible, you have mathematical formula 2 pi r^{2}. If we take this as the definition for 'circle', anything that can be defined as a singular, numerical value can be applied to this equation, since 'r' no longer means 'radius' but rather is a part of the definition of 'circle'. At this point 'circle' becomes completely meaningless despite being a singular definition for all things, since one can enter the value for circle into the calculation for the value of circle. Thus 'circle' refers to nothing and everything within the True, and is perfectly defined as 2 pi r^{2}.

On the positive end of the spectrum, an experience is experienced completely illogically. This experience is also false to 'reality' (0 cuil) and completely theoretical. To completely understand how our circle fits into positive infinite cuil, I wish to take you down the spectrum. Immediately, the circle is a 'circle' instead of a formula. At one cuil, where most of us live, the circle is a hamburger bun, or a patty, or perhaps a knot on a tree trunk. There is an infinite number of things that fit this definition of 'circle,' but there are also an infinite number of things that do not. Just as there is an infinity between 0 and 1, but 0<x<1 does not describe all numbers. All of these things are circles by the 1 cuil definition, but none of them are 'a circle.' As we branch along the spectrum the number of things that are defined as a 'circle' increase exponentially, until we can no longer count them. At the outer extremes of the positive spectrum, our experience of 'circle' has expanded so far that all things are contained within the definition. We have a situation of total entropy where all things are the same and we have a singular definition of everything that is a circle.

Does this singular definition sound familiar? Both reddye and positive infinite cuil end with a definition of 'circle' that is so untrue to the 'real' that they are nearly completely hypothetical, and only applicable to our attempts to comprehend the truth of 'circle' at zero cuil. By this logic, the band of possible experiences would be completely cyclical although not closed, such that there is an infinite number of possibilities between zero cuil and +/-infinite cuil. Seems fitting, since there is an infinite number of possibilities between 0 and +/- infinity.

Expanding upon this theoretical circle of cuil, where we picture a funnel system between 0 cuil and +-infinite cuil along the + and - axis, imaginary cuil fits in the space between the + and -. Where + and - values of cuil are found as locations within the dimensional plane of the axes, imaginary cuil is found in non-dimensional experience. This is the connection between the incomprehensive 0 cuil and unTrue infinite cuil. If we see 0 cuil as the Truth, and infinite cuil as the abstract understanding of the Truth, then imaginary cuil is the application of the abstract understanding within the singularity of Truth. It is the bridge between every opposing possibility in this cyclical linear explanation of experiential possibility. Imaginary cuil is the measuring unit for distances between non-linear cuils. At 0*i* cuil, the circle is completely True (0 cuil), completely unTrue (-+infinite cuil) and both perfectly defined and undefined, thus the circle is both at the 0 cuil and +/-infinite cuil levels of experience. There is 0 distance between 0 cuil and +-infinite cuil. At +-infinite*i* cuil, the experience is neither True nor defined. There is infinite distance between experiences.

At 2*i* cuil, our 'circle' is defined as both 2 pi r^{2} and the abstract "circle" of all things, as defined above in my explanation of -infinite and +infinite cuil. However, these definitions are no longer completely hypothetical. The definition does not completely describe the thing named 'circle' as it is at 0 cuil. There is

I hypothesize that we have an innate understanding of how to bridge the distance measured by imaginary cuil, and that is why we can use 2 pi r^{2} to describe a circle and everyone knows roughly what we mean. I believe that a part of understanding the imaginary cuil is in the application of every definition together at once, the definition of 'radius' and 'shape' and 'distance' all factoring in to what the definition of 'circle' means so that 'circle' fits in the True, where 'radius' and 'shape' and distance' exist. The imaginary is the logicalization of the abstract and the abstraction of the logical. It is the connection between 'rose' and 'flower,' and perhaps 'red' and even 'love.'

I see this theory as compatible with GMT, and this is how. Visualize the mesh of GMT as a 3 dimensional (or more) mesh. Every experience exists within this mesh, and the center of it is -/+infinite cuil *and* zero cuil. Within this mesh is contained a coloured area, sort of shaped like a multi-dimensional infinity symbol. It is singular at the point where it crosses itself, and each limb expands out from that singularity in thickness. As you travel toward the outer end of each loop the colour fades gradually until you can hardly tell it is there at all. the point where it fades completely is infinite cuil/2. The colour is the essence of our comprehension, and the width of the band is the infinite possible experiences of 'True' and 'Definition' at that number of cuil. However, there is more mesh than that which is contained within the positive, negative and zero cuil. This is the imaginary cuil, which we can pretend to experience. Positive imaginary cuil surrounds the positive cuil loop, -*i* cuil surrounds the - cuil loop. Through our attempts to experience through the imaginary cuil, that which is neither quite defined nor True, we can change our own experience and our perception of Truth and definition, so that perhaps, for a while, we are able to experience at 7 or 8 cuil, or -5, or -12. The less true and defined we are willing to get (the closer to +/- infinite *i* cuil), the farther we are able to jump in experience. If we equal +/- infinite *i* cuil, we can shift from +infinite cuil/2 to -infinite cuil/2, theoretically the farthest distance possible within the Cuil Mesh.

… In terms of the colour wheel example for GMT, imagine that + cuil is on the top of the page the wheel is printed on and - cuil is on the bottom, + imaginary cuil is the length of the pencil above the page and - imaginary cuil is the length below the page. This would make the outer edge of the page +/- infinite cuil and the inner edge (touching the pencil) zero cuil. The distance between the outer edge of the paper and the inner edge would have an imaginary cuil measurement of 0*i*. (This is much the same as how a horizontal line along the x axis of a cartesian plane has y=0, regardless of x.) +/-infinite *i* cuil is the ends of the pencil where you're holding it. You are +/-infinite *i* cuil. You connect understanding in the strangest ways possible, and you can comprehend every distance between experiences. To measure (and possibly traverse) a distance between experiences on opposite sides of the page, one must use imaginary cuil or zero/+/-infinite cuil, and since we can't comprehend zero/+/-infinite cuil, we must be imaginary.

Non-imaginary cuil is not a distance from True. From zero cuil. It is a distance between zero cuil and infinite cuil, with such numbers as +infinite cuil -4 cuil being to definition experience what +4 cuil is to Truth experience. The numbers go both ways. Every step away from zero is toward infinity, and vice versa. The midpoint is +/-infinite cuil/2

…

I must stop and return another day. It grows late, and my mind strays further into abstraction than I intend. It interests me that always we seek to define instead of understand, that we seek logical explanation instead of experience itself. Perhaps it is because so many of us live at one cuil, and, in reaching for the negative side of the spectrum, we hope to comprehend the Truth that lies between. To truly understand the nature of what the cuil measures, I believe that we must understand the immense scope of possibility and perception in every experience. We speak in infinities and zeros and imaginaries as though they mean something beyond the meaning we give them. The cuil is a measure of our experience relative to each other and the eternal truth that ties every experience together. To exist, we must exist within cuil's scale. And yet we seem to have the power to jump through the imaginary from logical experience to illogical and back, without ever experiencing the Truth of zero cuil or the definition of infinite cuil.

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy

Forum thread: Help With a Problem I have Concerning Cuil ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: Zero Cuil ]]>

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: How many cuils is this? ]]>

More thinking is required to match these two ideas in a solid and valid way, but it's definitely an interesting thought experiment.

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: Psychiatric conditions and their relation to Cuil ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: Cuil: The story of a taco ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions

Forum thread: Hi. I wandered in here and I'm eating your grapes. The two are not related. ]]>

I have a functioning cuil. It works like this.

First - The yang/yin/yang harmony explained in base 2 algebra.

yang (substance) - 1

yin (not-stated substance placeholder) - 0

At the first moments of the creation of a state of substance, substance comes into being from zero; becoming 1. The 1 representing the existence of some manifestation out of the ether of unlimited potential what is uncertainty. This is yang yin, or the unexpected manifestation.

From the instance of manifestation, every 1 has impacts on an environment which it interacts with finite 1s. Those reactions create new state of substance from 0. This is yin yang, or the unexpected reaction.

As manifestation is always primary influence to reaction, the notation of each reaction must note the influence of the reaction as one cuil abstracted from it. By regarding that as not-stated cuil, it functions as a negated cuil, providing clear definition for movement within abstraction.

This exploration does not account for the potential of lateral movement within abstraction.

Question:

Disclaimer: This may be a touchy subject. I simply want to probe thoughts on this matter. I don't mean to be offensive.

I keep seeing these statements "That's Dangerous", "catfishing", etc.. after images of transgendered individuals.. I'm curious how people feel about this. Do you think it should be required for a transgendered individual to reveal that to their partner? Is it catfishing? Should it be public knowledge? If yes/no, why?

Why do we care so much about intimate details of others that don't affect the greater good? Or do those details ultimately come into play?

Response:

I answer today a negative cuil abstracted from your question.

The culture understands and thus has narrative to appreciate only coercion. Thus the culture thinks in term of coercion. Thus the culture is violent.

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy

Forum thread: The cuil in practical use. ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions

Forum thread: Welcome to the forum ]]>

The way I see it is like the Fibonacci sequence. Find a gif of it and you'll see that no matter what values you apply to any given point, the same value can be given to the same spiral one second later. So given that we don't know where 0 cuils is, can't anyone say that their level of abstractions is… Say,, 3 cuils? Because, someone else could just as easily claim that that person is only at 2 cuils. We have no basis to build this cuil theory on.

Of course, through the limit that exists in phi, you can easily calculate that the limit is infinite, and when the spiral finally hits that point, it will be at zero.

The problem is, working backwards, any value can be applied to the Fibonacci spiral, and the rest of the infinite spiral would be built off of this value.

The same problem is applicable to the cuil theory, in that the value for zero cuils, is Any value. Zero cuils is the absolute limit, but without it, there is no basis to use. At the same time, we cannot find the value for zero cuils, Because it is the limit.

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: Philosophy Of Cuil ]]>

sin^2(theta)+cos^2(theta)=1

But I don't understand the whole

Sin^2(cuil)+cos^2(cuil)=1.618

Can someone please explain this? Is this just something that I haven't learned in scuil (school) yet?

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: Mathematics Of Cuil ]]>

Just some thoughts…

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy

Forum thread: Objectively Measuring Cuil ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions

Forum thread: Welcome to the forum ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions

Forum thread: Welcome to the forum ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: How many cuils is this? ]]>

That thing is Phi, the ratio that constantly works towards hitting '0' but never ever actually does. Theoretically.

The way I see it from my simple mind is that if you look at Phi in regards to its distance from a central line, the curvature gets closer and closer to '0'. However, if you look at it backwards, the curvature gets further and further away from '0' while still crossing over the center line.

Look into "Spirit Science" on YouTube. He has a great video about the Phi ratio.

Thanks for reading this shitty comment. Have a nice day!

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: Philosophy Of Cuil ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions

Forum thread: Welcome to the forum ]]>

You go to a restaurant and order a taco, only to find that at your feet has gathered enough oil to start a drilling company.

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: Cuil: The story of a taco ]]>

its not like they know it any more than you do

who do they think they are

bill nye

somebody should tell bill nye about cuil

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: Cuil: symbol and pronounciation ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: Just another formal definition of Cuils ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy

Forum thread: the ultimate comment ]]>

as for a community there really isnt one, just sometimes people come over here and see what the newest 5 posts are every year or so. sometimes somebody new finds this on like memebase or something and thinks "wow im smart and interested". they think correctly, but when they look at the forum they cry "why is it so dead".

but im no authority here im just baby

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions

Forum thread: I'm new, and I give you a hamburger. ]]>

What i mean is, maybe he meant to say surreality, and was describing such, as opposed to him meaning to describe abstraction and instead explaining surreality.

dont worry though, your stuff still basically fits at negative cuil but maybe should be spread out more. now that i think of it, with -∞ cuil being the truest thing, existence could fit, and this also explains how ∞ cuil would be non existence.

Nice.

But yeah its like labeling an orange 30 pounds when its really 30 grams, then someone looking at it and measuring it.

the problem arises when you choose to question measurements of weight and mass instead of questioning whether or not the label was correct.

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: levels of "abstract" or levels of "surreality" ]]>

If you have a scale of something, such as weight or time or distance, or in this case cuil,

its just a scale. In our current cuil level, we should treat it as such and not wonder about higher cuil levels.

its linear if you read the scale by redeye from the beginning or whatever. he just goes through the numbers the way you go through any numbers, in linear form. 1‽, 2‽, 3‽, 4‽, etc etc. i think he skips a few for the sake of time but thats about it.

I'm sure theres a much more efficient way, infinitely more efficient, down at -∞cuil, but at our cuil level it is what it is.

for what purpose would the scale not be linear? just to confuse people?

And i dont think you can really add cuils together. its like having people in a line. Adding the first person to the second person wont give you the third person, you just go through their numbers, first, second, third, fourth, and so on. the decimals in between (for example, 1.5 cuil) sort of break the analogy but you get the point. its a scale, not a unit.

but what do i know really

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: Cuil Scale ]]>

Yeah, that also falls under being the opposite of the truest thing, so it fits the pattern.

Nice writing too.

it also breaks paradoxes by making them not exist.

But wait, wouldnt ∞‽ also make non-existence not exist?

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: ∞‽ ]]>

I propose its based off of something called MR's or misrelativities. For each statement, a certain number of MR's are given, from a number 0-2.

They are determined by the 4 lines in a circle. The diameter is directly linked to the circle, or the reality. A chord would be .5 which partially fulfills the reality. A tangent would be 1 which has connections to the reality but it is indirectly connected. Then a random line that does not touch the circle would be 2 MR's where the statement is not relative to the reality at all. Then a conversion table between MR's and Cuil level will be made based off of the burger situation.

Then 1.5 MR's would be given if a statement has 1 partially relative idea and 1 non relative idea

In the burger situation, the 1st cuil level would have an MR value of 0.5 because the reality is partially being fulfilled.

The second cuil level, the MR value would be 2.5 because the reality is partially being fulfilled with the picture of the burger but there is the statement of nonexistent which has nothing to do with the reality of the situation, thus adding 2 MR's.

The third cuil level has 3 MR's because there are 3 statements that are not directly correlated with the reality, but through multiple conmections, they are partially related.

The fourth cuil level has 8.5 MR's. The German portion gives 2 due to no relation with the reality. Then the next 3 statements have 1.5 MR because they have one portion partially relative and 1 portion not relative. Then the last statement adds two because it is non relative.

As you head further up the cuil scale and get into more than 4 cuils, the number of misrepativities drastically increases. This will make a definite standard to how we measure the cuil level of a situation.

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: Mathematics Of Cuil ]]>

I don't understand how u get a cuil too. Is it just one difference between situations? And at a universal level shouldn't it be a logarithmic equation to determine the cuil level rather than individual cuils?

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: Mathematics Of Cuil ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: Cuil Scale ]]>

"One level of abstraction away from the reality of a situation."

What would that actually mean? I understand 'to abstract' as the act of generalizing to a simpler more fundamental thing. The given hamburger example doesn't simplify but complicate and make everything more surreal.

Wikipedia defines 'abstraction' as

"… a conceptual process by which ** general rules and concepts are derived** from the usage and classification of specific examples, literal ("real" or "concrete") signifiers, first principles, or other methods."

So basically no abstractions means reality… and the further the abstraction goes the more we have to find **general rules and concepts** with which we would express the situation. With each step we should get rid of detail and focus on the underlying concepts. So it depends on which general rules we choose in order to abstract. —> We can be creative and should end up with different results, I encourage you to try yourself!

So I'll try actually following the definition:

(speech is already an abstraction of a high degree, so it's more than zero cuil)

0 cuil: (the real situation. This text-format is unable to show it, a human brain is only partly able to understand it)

1 cuil: (my conscious perception of the situation. Again the text-format is inadequate. What happens is that you ask me for a hamburger in a park. I see the whole environment: the trees with their lush green leaves rattling around in a slight breeze, slightly yellow dry dirt making up the way we are standing on with a park bench next to us, you are standing in front of me with your hippie clothes on, a barking dog on the lawn playing with its owner, the smell of the freshly cut green grass together with the summer sunlight makes me feel whole and content. I fell the warmth of the freshly made hamburgers in the plastic bag that I am holding. I the gravity pulls them down and I counteract that force with my fingers and I feel it. I can hear and understand your question: "Ey dude… groovy, man. Can I have a hamburger, too? We're all human we should all share, I love you, man. Peace.")

2 cuil: (my imagination of the situation. Still no chance for the text-format. I imagine all of the things I described at 1 cuil.)

3 cuil: (a video of the situation.)

4 cuil: (I describe the situation with audible words, with facial expressions and gestures and with a meaningful tone in my voice.)

5 cuil: (The text description I gave at 1 cuil. I don't need to copy it…)

6 cuil: "You ask me for a hamburger."

7 cuil: Someone is being asked for something to eat.

8 cuil: A mammal communicates with another mammal.

9 cuil: Biological life is ongoing.

10 cuil: Physical laws are ongoing.

11 cuil: existence

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: levels of "abstract" or levels of "surreality" ]]>

How does one actually measure the dimension of the situation that a surreal text describes?

I can understand it up to 4 dimensions, since this is the world we live in, more or fewer dimensions are hard to imagine.

You gave dimension 6 to B = "I give you a hamburger. The hamburgers eye twitches involuntarily"

It is a 3 dimensional space moving through time, makes 4, but what are the other two?

Hamburgers having eyes could be one which might already include involuntary twitching. We end up with only 5.

twitching might be a separate dimension, as well as involuntarity -> we end up with 7 instead of 6.

It seems to me a bit arbitrary to assign dimensions to these concepts, or do you have a stringent rule for this?

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: Just another formal definition of Cuils ]]>

A couple of thoughts:

1) I think Cuil are probably order-of-magnitude units like Decibel and Richter. In this case 7 Cuil represents an interpretation 10^7 times more surreal than reality. This means that 0 is as low as you can go, and the fractions between 0 and 1 are the more frequently observed Cuil values. For example: I ask for a hamburger and I get a McDonald's hamburger: .9 Cuil. It's not at all what I was thinking of, but it's not quite a Raccoon. Alternately: I want to make a hamburger, but I do so badly, the resulting object is .2 Cuil of a hamburger. It's very nearly what I was intending, but not quite.

2) Cuil are subjective. A 0 Cuil hamburger is different for me than it is for the person next to me, and even more different from how it is for a person from an entirely different culture. There is, however, a "normalized" Cuil for every object/concept: an averaged cultural ideal for that object/concept. This is why we can say models are "beautiful" in the cultural way, and also say that regular beautiful curvy women are also "beautiful."

3) Mapping. The most accurate map of the world is the world. This is 0 Cuil. Not only does this become paradoxical, it is usless! This means, then, that there is an optimal Cuil for conveying intent without being accurate. It is somewhere between 0 and 1 Cuil and is what separates humans (who can interpret and extrapolate) from machines (which do not understand metaphor, yet).

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: Cuil: symbol and pronounciation ]]>

You can contact me here or twitter(dot)com/Net_Philosophy, let me know if you're interested in this and how willing you are to collaborate, thanks!

Forum category: Off Topic Forums / Website Business

Forum thread: I needa talk to an Admin (that means you RedDye) ]]>

Abstract art is reduced enough in form that it could be easily mass-produced, if the working class appreciated it. The reason this doesn't happen is because in order to appreciate the notion that reality is arbitrary, you have to be shielded from reality's effects on you; the wealthy buyers are shielded by their money, the artists by their minds, and the working class by nothing, hence the preference for more-concrete artistic works.

If you can't understand that, ask yourself why its graffiti, the modern art style most complicated and intricate in its form, that gets associated with the poorest neighborhoods.

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

That actually makes total sense. When you think things are at one cuil, you think the world is crazy and you are sane. When you think things are at negative one cuil, you think you're the crazy one while the world is sane. The experience of unreality comes from the absolute-value of the difference in cuil levels, and the sign of a subject's cuil level is based on *who or what* is responding appropriately relative to something else. A person undergoing a crisis of identity, who keeps doing things they think they don't intend, is at a high positive cuil value with respect to the world. If they are unaware of this, they experience the world as having an absurdly highly-negative cuil value. ("Why is everybody so NORMAL!!!") A person undergoing a crisis of comprehension, who has no idea what is going on, is at a high negative cuil value with respect to the world, and experiences the world as having an absurdly highly-positive cuil value. ("Why is everybody so CRAZY!!!")

Negative one cuil is when you try to ask for a raccoon but you actually ask for a hamburger, and someone then gives you a hamburger. As long as you are unaware of your action, you are at a vantage point of negative-one cuil with respect to the world, so you experience the world as if it were at a cuil value of one. "Why did you give me a hamburger? I asked for a raccoon." "Um… no you didn't." "Oh, you're right." Once you realize that you asked for a hamburger instead of a raccoon, you are at a cuil vantage point of zero with respect to the world, so you remember that past request as having a cuil-value of negative-one cuil, in that it now seems unreal because it then seemed normal.

This adds well, because if you think you're asking for a raccoon, you actually ask for a hamburger, but then someone does actually give you a raccoon anyway, that's a -1 to 1 interaction with respect to an outside observer; they experience the situation as having two cuils of abstraction from reality, because now, the person who receives the raccoon after asking for a hamburger didn't even think it was weird that they were given a raccoon. But it also gives rise to a new paradox: the person who asked the question, on the other hand, thinks it's all very normal because they're getting exactly what they asked for. I'm gonna call this paradox Cuil Complementation. People operating at a non-zero cuil level can subjectively experience absurd interactions with the outside world as totally normal if their cuil levels are equal and opposite on all relevant axes. To an outside observer, aware of the mismatch, the situation appears doubly-weird, but within the transaction, the cuil levels sum to zero.

I know that's not completely consistent: somehow, I think the Cuil Paradox is itself a function of negative cuil values, but hopefully someone else can say it more clearly.

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Academics

Forum thread: False Cuil Syndrome? ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Introductions

Forum thread: I'm new, and I give you a hamburger. ]]>

0 cuil = if you ask for a hamburger, your mind thinks of a hamburger

-1 cuil= you lust for a hamburger, the image of a hamburger circulates within your mind. You begin to have lucid dreams about hamburgers however just when every time you reach to obtain the hamburger your dream ends.

and then so on to the levels

*i don't know what i'm saying, just publishing my ideas.

Forum category: Hidden / Per page discussions

Forum thread: What Is Cuil Theory? ]]>

Aximomatically we are considering the Cuil Space to be a system of points in a plane of x dimentions (ill get back to that x), and we are also always considering 0‽ to be the pivot of this space or the lowest level of reality.

Then it necesarily follows that is we live in 0‽ (or tend to fall to 0‽ as some propose) the pain of existance of 1 dimantion of time and 3 of space is the most perfect conception of 0‽. Thus, if Cuil Space is structured around the pivotal reality, it must be so that ‽Space is structured in 3 dimentions, like a sphere. Thus, no negative numbers are posible, only movement around the space through vectors (introducing vectoral theory of Cuil to move from one conception of abstraction to another).

In vectoral Cuil we find that (x,y,z) z is the traditional N‽, and x and y wopuld be the vertical and horizonalt variations of randomness, creating for each z‽ a 2D plane of different posibilities of abstraction. Thus it also follows that the more abstract (the higher the z number) the more amount of 2D plane there is to move around and find more different abstractions

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / Cuil Theory Philosophy

Forum thread: Help With a Problem I have Concerning Cuil ]]>

Forum category: Cuil Unit Forum / General Discussion

Forum thread: In Laymen's terms ]]>